Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33025041›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2021

Ultrasonographic and hemodynamic characteristics of patients with symptomatic carotid near-occlusion: results from a multicenter registry study.

Michael Armando Palacios-Mendoza, A García-Pastor, A Gil-Núñez, J M Ramírez-Moreno, N González-Nafría, F Moniche, J C Portilla-Cuenca, B Fuentes, M A Gamero-García, M Alonso de Leciñana and 12 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 17 institutions in 1 country.

Michael Armando Palacios-MendozaHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Neurology, C/ Dr Esquerdo 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain. michaelpalmend@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9271-3942
A García-PastorHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Neurology, C/ Dr Esquerdo 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain.
A Gil-NúñezHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Neurology, C/ Dr Esquerdo 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain.
J M Ramírez-MorenoHospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Neurology, Badajoz, Spain.
N González-NafríaComplejo Asistencial Universitario de León, Neurology, Leon, Spain.
F MonicheHospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Neurology, Sevilla, Spain.
J C Portilla-CuencaHospital San Pedro Alcántara, Neurology, Cáceres, Spain.
B FuentesHospital Universitario La Paz, Neurology, Madrid, Spain.
M A Gamero-GarcíaHospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Neurology, Sevilla, Spain.
M Alonso de LeciñanaHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Neurology, Madrid, Spain.
J MasjuanHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Neurology, Madrid, Spain.
D Canovas-VergeCorporació Sanitaria Parc Taulí, Neurology, Sabadell, Spain.
Y AladroHospital Universitario de Getafe, Neurology, Getafe, Spain.
A LagoHospital Universitari La Fe, Neurology, Valencia, Spain.
A M de Arce-BordaHospital Universitario de Donostia, Neurology, Donostia, Spain.
M Usero-RuizHospital Universitario de Valladolid, Neurology, Valladolid, Spain.
R Delgado-MederosHospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Neurology, Barcelona, Spain.
A PampliegaHospital General Univeristario de Alicante, Neurology, Alicante, Spain.
Á Ximenez-CarrilloHospital Universitario de La Princesa, Neurology, Madrid, Spain.
M Bártulos-IglesiasHospital Universitario de Burgos, Neurology, Burgos, Spain.
E Castro-ReyesHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Neurology, C/ Dr Esquerdo 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain.
Stroke Project of the Spanish Cerebrovascular Diseases Study Group
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal · ESComplejo Asistencial Universitario de Palencia · ESCorporació Sanitària Parc Taulí · ESDonostiako Unibertsitate Ospitalea · ESHospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid · ESHospital de Sant Pau · ESHospital General Universitario de Alicante Doctor Balmis · ESHospital San Pedro de Alcántara · ESHospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe · ESHospital Universitario de Burgos · ESHospital Universitario de Getafe · ESHospital Universitario de La Princesa · ESHospital Universitario Infanta Cristina · ESHospital Universitario La Paz · ESHospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío · ESHospital Universitario Virgen Macarena · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe ultrasonographic and hemodynamic features of patients with carotid near-occlusion (CNO) are still not well known. Our aim was to describe the ultrasonographic and hemodynamic characteristics of a cohort of patients with CNO.

methodsA prospective, observational, nationwide, and multicenter study was conducted from January/2010 to May/2016. Patients with digital subtraction angiography (DSA)-confirmed CNO were included. We collected information on clinical and demographic characteristics, carotid and transcranial ultrasonography and DSA findings, presence of full-collapse, collateral circulation, and cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR).

resultsOne hundred thirty-five patients were analyzed. Ultrasonographic and DSA diagnosis of CNO were concordant in only 44%. This disagreement was related to the presence/absence of full-collapse: 45% of patients with CNO with full-collapse were classified as a complete carotid occlusion, and 40% with a CNO without full-collapse were interpreted as severe stenosis (p < 0.001). Mean velocities (mV) and pulsatility indexes (PIs) were significantly lower in the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery compared with the contralateral (43 cm/s vs 58 cm/s, p < 0.001; 0.80 vs 1.00, p < 0.001). Collateral circulation was identified in 92% of patients, with the anterior communicating artery (73%) being the most frequent. CVR was decreased or exhausted in 66% of cases and was more frequent in patients with a poor or absent collateral network compared with patients with ≥ 2 collateral arteries (82% vs 56%, p = 0.051).

conclusionThe accuracy of carotid ultrasonography in the diagnosis of CNO seems to be limited, with significant discrepancies with DSA. Decreased ipsilateral mV, PI, and CVR suggest a hemodynamic compromise in patients with CNO.

Indexed as

Carotid Artery DiseasesCarotid StenosisCarotid Artery, InternalCerebrovascular CirculationCollateral CirculationHemodynamicsHumansProspective StudiesRegistriesUltrasonography, Doppler, TranscranialCarotid near-occlusionCarotid stenosisCerebrovascular reactivityCollateral circulationHemodynamicsUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID33025041
OpenAlexW3092011782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.