Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33025002›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of epidemiology2021

Randomized Trial Evaluation of the Benefits and Risks of Menopausal Hormone Therapy Among Women 50-59 Years of Age.

Ross L Prentice, Aaron K Aragaki, Rowan T Chlebowski, Jacques E Rossouw, Garnet L Anderson, Marcia L Stefanick, Jean Wactawski-Wende, Lewis H Kuller, Robert Wallace, Karen C Johnson and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of epidemiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Brazilian Guideline on Menopausal Cardiovascular Health - 2024.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2024
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Then and Now: What We Have Learned From the WHI.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Brazilian Guideline on Menopausal Cardiovascular Health - 2024.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ross L Prentice
Aaron K Aragaki
Rowan T Chlebowski
Jacques E Rossouw
Garnet L Anderson
Marcia L Stefanick
Jean Wactawski-Wende
Lewis H Kuller
Robert Wallace
Karen C Johnson
Aladdin H Shadyab
Margery Gass
JoAnn E Manson
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · US

Funding

Nutrition and Physical Activity Assessment Study (NPAAS)R01CA119171 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Marian L Neuhouser · 2006 to 2026
$14.3M
Statistical Methods for Multivariate Failure Time DataR01CA210921 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI PRENTICE, ROSS L · 2017 to 2018
$329k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA119171NCI NIH HHS R01 CA210921NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100046CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201600002CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201600003CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201600004CNIDA NIH HHS HHSN271201600004CNIDA NIH HHS HHSN271201600004I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The health benefits and risks of menopausal hormone therapy among women aged 50-59 years are examined in the Women's Health Initiative randomized, placebo-controlled trials using long-term follow-up data and a parsimonious statistical model that leverages data from older participants to increase precision. These trials enrolled 27,347 healthy postmenopausal women aged 50-79 years at 40 US clinical centers during 1993-1998, including 10,739 post-hysterectomy participants in a trial of conjugated equine estrogens and 16,608 participants with a uterus in the trial of these estrogens plus medroxyprogesterone acetate. Over a (median) 18-year follow-up period (1993-2016), risk for a global index (defined as the earliest of coronary heart disease, invasive breast cancer, stroke, pulmonary embolism, colorectal cancer, endometrial cancer, hip fracture, and all-cause mortality) was reduced with conjugated equine estrogens with a hazard ratio of 0.82 (95% confidence interval: 0.71, 0.95), and with nominally significant reductions for coronary heart disease, breast cancer, hip fracture, and all-cause mortality. Corresponding global index hazard ratio estimates of 1.06 (95% confidence interval: 0.95, 1.19) were nonsignificant for combined estrogens plus progestin, but increased breast cancer risk and reduced endometrial cancer risk were observed. These results, among women 50-59 years of age, substantially agree with the worldwide observational literature, with the exception of breast cancer for estrogens alone.

Indexed as

Coronary DiseaseEstrogen Replacement TherapyEstrogens, Conjugated (USP)FemaleHip FracturesHumansMedroxyprogesterone AcetateMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPostmenopauseProportional Hazards ModelsPulmonary EmbolismStrokeEstrogens, Conjugated (USP)Medroxyprogesterone Acetatebenefits versus risksestrogensglobal indexhazard ratiomenopausal hormone therapymultivariate failure timesprogestin

Identifiers

PMID33025002
PMCPMC8086238
OpenAlexW3092464865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.