Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33024946›Full record

ArticleAnimal models and experimental medicine2020

Pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and neurochemical investigations of lamotrigine-pentylenetetrazole kindled mice to ascertain it as a reliable model for clinical drug-resistant epilepsy.

Sandeep Kumar, Rajesh K Goel

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal models and experimental medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sandeep KumarDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences & Drug Research Punjabi University Patiala Punjab India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8077-6746
Rajesh K GoelDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences & Drug Research Punjabi University Patiala Punjab India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1408-4295
Punjabi University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPentylenetetrazole kindling has long been used for the screening of investigational antiseizure drugs. The presence of lamotrigine, at a very low dose, does not hamper kindling in mice; rather it modifies this epileptogenesis process into drug-resistant epilepsy. The lamotrigine-pentylenetetrazole kindled mice show resistance to lamotrigine, phenytoin, and carbamazepine. It may also be possible that other licensed antiseizure drugs, like the mentioned drugs, remain ineffective in this model; therefore, this was the subject of this study.

methodsSwiss albino mice were kindled with pentylenetetrazole for 35 days in the presence of either methylcellulose vehicle or lamotrigine (subtherapeutic dose, ie, 5 mg/kg). Vehicle vs lamotrigine-kindled mice were compared in terms of (a) resistance/response toward nine antiseizure drugs applied as monotherapies and two drug combinations; (b) lamotrigine bioavailability in blood and brain; (c) blood-brain barrier integrity; and (d) amino acids and monoamines in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus.

resultsLamotrigine vs vehicle-kindled mice are similar (or not significantly different

conclusionLamotrigine-pentylenetetrazole kindling takes longer to develop (~5 weeks) in comparison to lamotrigine-amygdale (~4 weeks) and lamotrigine-corneal (~2 weeks) kindling models. However, drug screening through this model may yield superior drugs with novel antiseizure mechanisms.

Indexed as

animal modelsdrug‐resistant epilepsykindlinglamotriginerefractory epilepsy

Identifiers

PMID33024946
PMCPMC7529331
OpenAlexW3047187051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.