Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33024883›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2020

Statistical properties of Continuous Composite Outcomes: Implications for clinical trial design.

Jesse D Troy, Ryan A Simmons

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jesse D TroyThe Marcus Center for Cellular Cures, Duke University School of Medicine, USA.
Ryan A SimmonsDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, 424 Erwin Road Suite, 1102 Hock Plaza Box 2721, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Statistical efficiency can be gained in clinical trials by using composites of time-to-event outcomes when the individual component outcomes have low event rates. However, the utility of continuous composite outcome measures is not as clear. Efficiency can be either gained or lost by using a continuous composite outcome measure depending on several factors, including the strength of correlation between the component outcomes and the size of the treatment effect on each component. In this article we review these concepts from the standpoint of planning a new trial. Statistical properties of composites formed from normally distributed continuous outcomes are discussed. An example dataset is used to demonstrate concepts and complete mathematical details are provided. Finally, a conceptual model for clinical trial design with continuous composites is proposed that could be used as a guide to evaluate the utility of a continuous composite outcome in a future trial based on existing knowledge in the therapeutic area.

Indexed as

Clinical trialsStatisticsTreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID33024883
PMCPMC7530289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.