ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2020
Research on the effect of health care integration on patients' negative emotions and satisfaction with lung cancer nursing activities.
Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application Efficacy of Nursing Interventions Guided by the Medication-Psychological-Nursing-Family-Support (MPNFS) Framework in Mitigating Cancer-Related Fatigue and Enhancing Pulmonary Function Among Lung Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy.Cancer management and research · 2025Article
- Effects of evidence-based nursing under a quantitative assessment strategy on cancer-related fatigue, self-management ability, and quality of life in lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Effect of the Online Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction on Anxiety and Depression Status of COVID-19 Patients Treated in Fangcang Hospitals: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Psychology research and behavior management · 2023Article
- Influence of Psychological Nursing Procedure on Negative Emotion, Stress State, Quality of Life and Nursing Satisfaction in Patients with Lung Cancer Radical Operation.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Effects of comprehensive care on complications, oxygenation indexes and guardian's psychological mood of children with neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLung cancer is a clinical disease with multiple malignant tumors. Currently, it is difficult for patients to benefit from routine clinical nursing due to the lack of a pertinent and systematic approach.
aimTo investigate the effect of integrated nursing care on the negative emotions and satisfaction of lung cancer patients.
methodsFrom January 2018 to December 2019, 92 patients with lung cancer were selected and divided into the study group and the control group; there were 46 patients in each group. The control group received routine nursing, and the study group received integrated medical care in addition to the care received by the control group. Negative emotions before and after the intervention, the self-management ability score after the intervention, family care burden after the intervention and nursing satisfaction after the intervention were measured in the two groups.
resultsAfter the intervention, the self-rating anxiety scale and self-rating depression scale scores in the study group were lower than those in the control group (
conclusionAn integrated nursing care approach for lung cancer patients can effectively relieve the patient's negative feelings, improve their self-management ability, help to reduce the burden of family care and improve patient satisfaction with nursing activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.