Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33024615›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2020

Optical Vortex Beam for Gentle and Ultraprecise Intrastromal Corneal Dissection in Refractive Surgery.

Sebastian Freidank, Alfred Vogel, Norbert Linz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sebastian FreidankInstitute of Biomedical Optics, University of Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany.
Alfred VogelInstitute of Biomedical Optics, University of Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany.
Norbert LinzInstitute of Biomedical Optics, University of Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany.
University of Lübeck · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: We introduce a novel focus shaping concept for intrastromal corneal dissection that facilitates cleavage along corneal lamellae, and we analyze laser-tissue interactions governing cutting effectiveness and mechanical side effects. Methods: Focus shaping was achieved by a spiral phase plate that converts an incident Gaussian beam into a Laguerre-Gaussian beam with a helical phase. Such vortex beams have zero intensity at their center, are propagation invariant, and possess a ring focus equal in length to the Gaussian focus but with a larger diameter. Cutting precision and the required absorbed energy for flap dissection were compared for Gaussian and vortex beams on ex vivo porcine corneal specimens at pulse durations between 480 fs and 9 ps. Cutting quality and bubble formation were characterized by scanning electron microscopy and macro photography. Results: With the vortex beam, the cuts were much smoother. Bubble formation was markedly reduced because cutting can be performed close to the bubble threshold, whereas with the Gaussian beam energies well above threshold are needed. Although the incident energy at the flap dissection threshold was slightly larger for the vortex beam, the absorbed energy was much smaller and contributed more effectively to cutting. This reduced plasma-induced pressure more than sevenfold. Conclusions: The vortex beam approach for corneal dissection is a simple, versatile, and cost-effective way of improving the precision of refractive surgery while reducing bubble formation and pressure-related mechanical side effects. Translational Relevance: Phase plates for propagation invariant vortex beams are easily implemented in the beam path of next-generation clinical devices.

Indexed as

Corneal StromaRefractive Surgical ProceduresAnimalsCorneaDissectionLasersSwineflap cuttingfocus shapinglaser dissectionlenticule dissectionrefractive surgery

Identifiers

PMID33024615
PMCPMC7521178
OpenAlexW3087852663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.