ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2020
RIPASA and air scoring systems are superior to alvarado scoring in acute appendicitis: Diagnostic accuracy study.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Swedish national guidelines for diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis in adults and children.BJS open · 2025Guideline
- Diagnostic value of the appendicitis inflammatory response (AIR) score. A systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2025Pooled it
- Comparison of RIPASA and ALVARADO scores for risk assessment of acute appendicitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2022Pooled it
- Comparison of the effectiveness of RIPASA and modified Alvarado scores in identifying perforated appendicitis.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2026Article
- Comparison of the diagnostic values of MASS, RIPASA, AIR, and AAS scores in adult patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected appendicitis.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Observational
- Complicated versus uncomplicated acute appendicitis: clinical characteristics, diagnostic scores, surgical management, and outcomes in a tertiary hospital in Mogadishu, Somalia.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Urinary 5-HIAA as a Potential Diagnostic Marker in Acute Appendicitis: A Preliminary Report of Its Promising Role in Early Detection.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- The role of clinical, laboratory, and imaging findings in the diagnosis of appendicitis: a retrospective analysis.Przeglad gastroenterologiczny · 2025Article
- Article
- Development and evaluation of a clinical decision support system for early diagnosis of acute appendicitis.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Article
- RIPASA versus Alvarado score in the assessment of acute appendicitis: A prospective study.Turkish journal of surgery · 2023Article
- Alvarado or RIPASA? Which one do you use to diagnose acute appendicitis?: A cross-sectional study.Health science reports · 2023Article
- Article
- Comparison of Appendicitis Scoring Systems in Childhood Appendicitis.Turkish archives of pediatrics · 2022Article
- Value of Alvarado scoring system in diagnosis of acute appendicitis.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy Rates of Appendicitis Scoring Systems for the Stratified Age Groups.Emergency medicine international · 2022Article
- Appendicitis Inflammatory Response Score in Comparison to Alvarado Score in Acute Appendicitis.Surgery journal (New York, N.Y.) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute appendicitis remains difficult-to-diagnose in spite of being a common acute abdominal condition. Early and correct diagnosis is essential either to proceed with early appendectomy or conservative approach so that complications and negative explorations can be minimised. Scoring systems can help in quick diagnosis and decision making. Though the Alvarado scoring is the widely used system, differences in diagnostic accuracy have been observed when it is applied to varied populations. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe objective was to find the predictive accuracy of Modified Alvarado score, Appendicitis Inflammatory Response score and Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis score, in a diagnostic test evaluation study. From first January 2018 to first January 2019, 107 consecutive patients admitted with a diagnosis of suspected appendicitis were assessed with these scores. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, positive and negative likelihood ratio and area under curve were determined for each.
resultsNegative appendicectomy rate was 15.89%. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy were 64.44%, 58.82%, 89.23%, 23.81% and 63.55% respectively for Modified Alvarado; 97.78%, 29.41%, 88%, 71.43% and 86.92% respectively for Appendicitis Inflammatory Response; 87.78%, 76.47%, 95.18%, 54.17% and 85.98% respectively for Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis. Area under the curve was 0.726797 for Modified Alvarado, 0.946732 for Appendicitis Inflammatory Response and 0.910131 for Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis
conclusionAppendicitis Inflammatory Response score probably is superior to Alvarado in the paediatric population because the variables scored are easy to apply to children, while Alvarado requires children to identify subjective symptoms which may not always be accurate. Appendicitis Inflammatory Response and Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis are better diagnostic scoring system for acute appendicitis than Modified Alvarado. Also, both these scores can be easily calculated by complete history, detailed clinical examination and basic laboratory investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.