Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33024395›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2020

Transitioning patients with inflammatory bowel disease from hospital-based to rapid home-based infliximab: A stepwise, safety and patient-orientated process towards sustainability.

Anuj Bohra, Qurat-Al-Ain Rizvi, Charlotte Yuen Yu Keung, Abhinav Vasudevan, Daniel R van Langenberg

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06839820 (iRAPID), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06839820 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

iRAPID: Infliximab Infusion Rate in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease. A Randomized Non-inferiority Trial of Infusion Reactions With Infliximab Infusion-rates of 30 Minutes and 60 Minutes

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, AkershusRan2025 to 2026Enrolled60ConditionsInfliximab, Infusion, IBD (Inflammatory Bowel Disease), Patient SatisfactionArmsInfusion rate of infliximab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anuj BohraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Eastern Health, Box Hill 3128, Victoria, Australia.
Qurat-Al-Ain RizviDepartment of Gastroenterology, Eastern Health, Box Hill 3128, Victoria, Australia.
Charlotte Yuen Yu KeungDepartment of Gastroenterology, Eastern Health, Box Hill 3128, Victoria, Australia.
Abhinav VasudevanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Eastern Health, Box Hill 3128, Victoria, Australia.
Daniel R van LangenbergDepartment of Gastroenterology, Eastern Health, Box Hill 3128, Victoria, Australia.
Eastern Health · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfliximab and other intravenous biologic infusions are increasingly used for chronic disorders like inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Rapid infliximab and home-based infusions are attractive solutions to address resource and capacity issues for infusion centres, yet infliximab infusion reactions reportedly occur in up to 25% of patients with IBD, even at the manufacturers' recommended infusion duration of 2 h.

aimTo evaluate the safety, cost and patient satisfaction of transitioning from hospital-based, standard 2 h to rapid home-based, 30-min infliximab infusions.

methodsAll patients receiving rapid infliximab infusions for IBD between 2014 to 2017 (39 mo) were compared with those who received standard two-hour IFX infusions between 2005-2013 (96 mo) at a single IBD centre. Data (per-infusion and per-individual) including adverse drug reactions (ADR), duration (based on needle-departure time) and other clinical data were extracted from electronic medical records. Multivariable logistical regression analysis assessed factors potentially associated with increased risk of ADRs to rapid infusions. The primary outcome was the safety [as per relative risk (RR) of ADR] of (1) rapid 30 m infusions (both hospital- and home-based)

resultsOf 129 patients who received 1461 rapid IFX infusions (2014-2017) were compared with 169 patients who received 2214 standard IFX infusions (2005-2013). Within the rapid cohort, 55 (42.6%) were males, median age 42 years (range 18, 86), 114 (84%) had Crohn's disease (CD) with a median disease duration 5 years (0, 36). Median needle to departure time was higher in the standard than the rapid protocol group, 108 (70, 253)

conclusionTransitioning to rapid infliximab infusions appears very safe with significant cost benefit, patient satisfaction and avails the provision of safe, efficient, home-based infliximab infusions by IBD centres worldwide.

Indexed as

Crohn DiseaseInflammatory Bowel DiseasesAdolescentFemaleGastrointestinal AgentsHospitalsHumansInfliximabInfusions, IntravenousMaleGastrointestinal AgentsInfliximabCostDrug reactionInflammatory bowel diseaseInfliximabSafetyTherapy

Identifiers

PMID33024395
PMCPMC7520608
OpenAlexW3088010042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.