Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33024377›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2020

Clinical Utility of the Behavioral Pain Assessment Tool in Patients Admitted in the Intensive Care Unit.

Sukanya Mitra, Kompal Jain, Jasveer Singh, Puja Saxena, Tenzin Nyima, Selwin R Selvam, Mansi C Walia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Behavioral Pain Assessment Tool: Yet Another Attempt to Measure Pain in Sedated and Ventilated Patients!Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sukanya MitraDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.
Kompal JainDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.
Jasveer SinghDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.
Puja SaxenaDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.
Tenzin NyimaDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.
Selwin R SelvamDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.
Mansi C WaliaDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUnnoticed and unrelieved pain is one of the main sources of psychological and physiological stress for intensive care unit (ICU) patients. The eight-item behavior pain assessment tool (BPAT) is a multicountry validated tool to assess pain in ICU patients. However, its feasibility and clinical utility for ICU patients in India need further research. AIMS AND

objectivesThe Aims and objectives of the study were to assess pain using BPAT and its clinical utility in pain assessment and management in ICU patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsFollowing ethical approval, 400 consecutive adult patients admitted in the ICUs in a tertiary care teaching hospital were assessed for pain severity using BPAT at intake, baseline pain and procedural pain. Patients <18 years and in deep coma on the Glasgow coma scale were excluded from the study. The patients with BPAT score ≥4 were given opioid analgesic, and their pain was reassessed after 2-3 hours. A feedback regarding feasibility and clinical utility was filled by the doctors.

resultsHigh interrater agreement for BPAT was observed with excellent kappa coefficients (>0.85) for each item. The BPAT significantly guided the pain management (

conclusionThe BPAT is a reliable, brief, and an easy-to-use pain assessment tool, which clinicians can use for guiding pain assessment and management in the ICU setting on a routine basis. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: We recommend implementing BPAT in the clinical practice for better pain assessment and control in ICU patients. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Mitra S, Jain K, Singh J, Saxena P, Nyima T, Selvam SR,

Indexed as

AssessmentIntensive care unitManagementPainScaleUtility

Identifiers

PMID33024377
PMCPMC7519617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.