ArticleNature neuroscience2020
Author Correction: Using Bayes factor hypothesis testing in neuroscience to establish evidence of absence.
Article in Nature neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differential Effects of Self-Initiated, Externally Triggered, and Passive Movements on Action-Outcome Processing: Insights From Sensory and Motor-Preparatory Event Related Potentials.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Article
- Tell me why: A scoping review on the fundamental building blocks of fMRI-based network analysis.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2025Article
- Pre-movement event-related potentials and multivariate pattern of EEG encode action outcome prediction.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- Article
- A Single Bout of High-Intensity Cardiovascular Exercise Does Not Enhance Motor Performance and Learning of a Visuomotor Force Modulation Task, but Triggers Ipsilateral Task-Related EEG Activity.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Are dishonest politicians more likely to be reelected? A Bayesian view.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.
Identifiers
33024320What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.