Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33024318›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2020

Improving translation of animal models of addiction and relapse by reverse translation.

Marco Venniro, Matthew L Banks, Markus Heilig, David H Epstein, Yavin Shaham

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 117 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
117citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

117 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Intermittent and extended cocaine access attenuate cocaine-vs-food choice in male and female rats.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Reverse Translation.Perspectives on behavior science · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Dopamine signatures of excessive and compulsive cocaine and fentanyl use.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

57 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marco VenniroIntramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. venniro.marco@nih.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7653-957X
Matthew L BanksDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4949-5246
Markus HeiligCenter for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2706-2482
David H EpsteinIntramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Yavin ShahamIntramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. yavin.shaham@nih.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8242-3319

Funding

Immunopharmacotherapy for Mitigating Opioid AddictionUH3DA041146 · NIDA · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI JANDA, KIM · 2017 to 2019
$4.4M
Medications Development for Stimulant AbuseR01DA026946 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI NEGUS, SIDNEY S · 2009 to 2019
$3.7M
Novel fentanyl derivatives as counteracting agents against fentanylUG3DA050311 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI ZHANG, YAN · 2019 to 2020
$2.2M
The protective effect of volitional social interaction on drug addictionR00DA047976 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI VENNIRO, MARCO · 2021 to 2023
$747k
NIDA NIH HHS R00 DA047976NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA026946NIDA NIH HHS UG3 DA050311NIDA NIH HHS UH3 DA041146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Critical features of human addiction are increasingly being incorporated into complementary animal models, including escalation of drug intake, punished drug seeking and taking, intermittent drug access, choice between drug and non-drug rewards, and assessment of individual differences based on criteria in the fourth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV). Combined with new technologies, these models advanced our understanding of brain mechanisms of drug self-administration and relapse, but these mechanistic gains have not led to improvements in addiction treatment. This problem is not unique to addiction neuroscience, but it is an increasing source of disappointment and calls to regroup. Here we first summarize behavioural and neurobiological results from the animal models mentioned above. We then propose a reverse translational approach, whose goal is to develop models that mimic successful treatments: opioid agonist maintenance, contingency management and the community-reinforcement approach. These reverse-translated 'treatments' may provide an ecologically relevant platform from which to discover new circuits, test new medications and improve translation.

Indexed as

Translational Research, BiomedicalAnalgesics, OpioidAnimalsBrainDisease Models, AnimalDrug-Seeking BehaviorRecurrenceReinforcement, PsychologyRewardSubstance-Related DisordersAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.