Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33024225›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Modeling a population of retinal ganglion cells with restricted Boltzmann machines.

Riccardo Volpi, Matteo Zanotto, Alessandro Maccione, Stefano Di Marco, Luca Berdondini, Diego Sona, Vittorio Murino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Optimal Encoding in Stochastic Latent-Variable Models.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Riccardo Volpi *Naver Labs Europe, Meylan, France. riccardo.volpi@outlook.com.
Matteo Zanotto *Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy.
Alessandro MaccioneIstituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy.
Stefano Di MarcoUniversità degli Studi dell'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4847-6270
Luca BerdondiniIstituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9521-2812
Diego SonaIstituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2883-5336
Vittorio MurinoIstituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The retina is a complex circuit of the central nervous system whose aim is to encode visual stimuli prior the higher order processing performed in the visual cortex. Due to the importance of its role, modeling the retina to advance in interpreting its spiking activity output is a well studied problem. In particular, it has been shown that latent variable models can be used to model the joint distribution of Retinal Ganglion Cells (RGCs). In this work, we validate the applicability of Restricted Boltzmann Machines to model the spiking activity responses of a large a population of RGCs recorded with high-resolution electrode arrays. In particular, we show that latent variables can encode modes in the RGC activity distribution that are closely related to the visual stimuli. In contrast to previous work, we further validate our findings by comparing results associated with recordings from retinas under normal and altered encoding conditions obtained by pharmacological manipulation. In these conditions, we observe that the model reflects well-known physiological behaviors of the retina. Finally, we show that we can also discover temporal patterns, associated with distinct dynamics of the stimuli.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsAnimalsMicePhotic StimulationRetinaRetinal Ganglion Cells

Identifiers

PMID33024225
PMCPMC7538558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.