Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33024224›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Continental-scale patterns of hyper-cryptic diversity within the freshwater model taxon Gammarus fossarum (Crustacea, Amphipoda).

Remi Wattier, Tomasz Mamos, Denis Copilaş-Ciocianu, Mišel Jelić, Anthony Ollivier, Arnaud Chaumot, Michael Danger, Vincent Felten, Christophe Piscart, Krešimir Žganec and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A Blind-Identification Test onPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Remi WattierUMR CNRS 6282 Biogéosciences, Université Bourgogne Franche Comté, Dijon, France. remi.wattier@u-bourgogne.fr.
Tomasz MamosDepartment of Invertebrate Zoology and Hydrobiology, University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.
Denis Copilaş-CiocianuInstitute of Ecology, Nature Research Centre, Vilnius Nature Research Centre, Institute of Ecology, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Mišel JelićDepartment of Natural Sciences, Varaždin City Museum, Varaždin, Croatia.
Anthony OllivierUMR CNRS 6282 Biogéosciences, Université Bourgogne Franche Comté, Dijon, France.
Arnaud ChaumotLaboratoire d'écotoxicologie, INRAE, UR RiverLy, Villeurbanne, France.
Michael DangerUMR CNRS 73602 LIEC, Université de Lorraine, Metz, France.
Vincent FeltenUMR CNRS 73602 LIEC, Université de Lorraine, Metz, France.
Christophe PiscartUniv Rennes, CNRS, ECOBIO-UMR 6553, 35000, Rennes, France.
Krešimir ŽganecDepartment of Teacher Education Studies in Gospić, University of Zadar, Gospić, Croatia.
Tomasz RewiczDepartment of Invertebrate Zoology and Hydrobiology, University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.
Anna WysockaDepartment of Genetics and Biosystematics, University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Thierry RigaudUMR CNRS 6282 Biogéosciences, Université Bourgogne Franche Comté, Dijon, France.
Michał GrabowskiDepartment of Invertebrate Zoology and Hydrobiology, University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland. michal.grabowski@biol.uni.lodz.pl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional morphological diagnoses of taxonomic status remain widely used while an increasing number of studies show that one morphospecies might hide cryptic diversity, i.e. lineages with unexpectedly high molecular divergence. This hidden diversity can reach even tens of lineages, i.e. hyper cryptic diversity. Even well-studied model-organisms may exhibit overlooked cryptic diversity. Such is the case of the freshwater crustacean amphipod model taxon Gammarus fossarum. It is extensively used in both applied and basic types of research, including biodiversity assessments, ecotoxicology and evolutionary ecology. Based on COI barcodes of 4926 individuals from 498 sampling sites in 19 European countries, the present paper shows (1) hyper cryptic diversity, ranging from 84 to 152 Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units, (2) ancient diversification starting already 26 Mya in the Oligocene, and (3) high level of lineage syntopy. Even if hyper cryptic diversity was already documented in G. fossarum, the present study increases its extent fourfold, providing a first continental-scale insight into its geographical distribution and establishes several diversification hotspots, notably south-eastern and central Europe. The challenges of recording hyper cryptic diversity in the future are also discussed.

Indexed as

Fresh WaterGenetic VariationHydrobiologyAmphipodaAnimalsDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicEcotoxicologyEuropeEvolution, MolecularGenetic LinkagePhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID33024224
PMCPMC7538970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.