Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33024143›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Heavy metal pollution and risk assessment by the battery of toxicity tests.

Mohd Shahnawaz Khan, Mehjbeen Javed, Md Tabish Rehman, Maryam Urooj, Md Irshad Ahmad

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Polypyrrole Solid-State Supercapacitors Drawn on Paper.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Water quality index,Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Bioaccumulation of heavy metals and their toxicity assessment inSaudi journal of biological sciences · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohd Shahnawaz KhanProtein Research Chair, Department of Biochemistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mehjbeen JavedDepartment of Zoology, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, U.P., India. mehjabeenjaved200@gmail.com.
Md Tabish RehmanDepartment of Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Maryam UroojUnaffiliated, Yanbu, Saudi Arabia.
Md Irshad AhmadDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Life Sciences, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, U.P., India. irshadahmad.bio@gmail.com.
Aligarh Muslim University · INKing Saud University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current study was carried out on dominant fish Oreochromis niloticus and water collected from the polluted Yamuna River, Agra, India. The heavy metals in water, recorded as follows: Fe > Mn > Zn > Cu > Ni > Cr > Cd and all were found to be above the prescribed limits. According to metal pollution index, exposed muscle (49.86), kidney (47.68) and liver (45.26) have been recorded to have higher bioaccumulation. The blood biochemical analysis of exposed O. niloticus indicated significant increase in activities of aspartate aminotransferase (+ 343.5%), alkaline phosphatase (+ 673.6%), alanine aminotransferase (+ 309.1%), and creatinine (+ 494.3%) over the reference. However, a significant decrease in albumin (A): globulins (G) ratio (- 87.86%) was observed. Similarly, the exposed fish also showed significant increase in total leucocyte count (+ 121%), differential leucocyte count, respiratory burst (+ 1175%), and nitric oxide synthase (+ 420%). The histological examination of liver and kidney showed tissue injury. Moreover, micronuclei (0.95%), kidney shaped nuclei (1.2%), and lobed nuclei (0.6%) along with DNA damage in the form of mean tail length in the liver (20.7 µm) and kidney (16.5 µm) was observed in the exposed O. niloticus. Potential health risk assessments based on estimated daily intake, target hazard quotient, hazard index, and target cancer risk indicated health risks associated with the consumption of these contaminated fishes. In conclusion, the present study showed that exposure to heavy metals contaminated water can alter immunological response; induce histopathological alterations and DNA damage in the studied fish. The consumption of this contaminated water or fish could have serious impact on human health.

Indexed as

AnimalsCichlidsDNA DamageEnvironmental MonitoringEnvironmental PollutionFresh WaterIndiaMetals, HeavyRisk AssessmentRiversToxicity TestsWater Pollutants, ChemicalMetals, HeavyWater Pollutants, Chemical

Identifiers

PMID33024143
PMCPMC7538597
OpenAlexW3091971441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.