ArticleThe Kobe journal of medical sciences2020
Quantitative Evaluation of Handwriting Skills during Childhood.
Article in The Kobe journal of medical sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Multicenter Cohort Study of 3805 RibXcar Cases: Safety and Efficacy in Incisionless Rib Remodeling.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Article
- Interpol questioned documents review 2019-2022.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHandwriting skills are very important skills for school-aged children, and consist of the abilities to control writing pressure and to assess shapes visually. Currently, various kinds of research have been conducted to clarify the developmental process of handwriting to establish methods for evaluating handwriting skills. However, a gold standard method has not been established. PURPOSE: This study aimed to clarify the developmental process of handwriting and to develop a new method for evaluating handwriting skills.
methodOne hundred ninety-nine children aged from 4 to 12 years old and 17 young adults participated in this study. They were asked to draw a line carefully between two parallel lines with an electronic pen. Pressure during drawing and distance from the center point of the parallel lines were monitored continually using originally developed computer software.
resultsDepending on age, the average pressure increased until seven years old, and afterward it was sustained at almost the same level as adults. The distance from the center points was similarly reduced until seven years old, and afterward it also remained at the same level. On the other hand, the time required for performance increased until the age of 7, whereupon it decreased with age. Considering the factor of speed in the second step, handwriting skills gradually improved depending on age even after seven years old.
conclusionIn the development of handwriting skills, our study suggests that accuracy develops in an earlier stage and then the ability of speed control develops in the next stage. The new method developed in this study is expected to be useful as a tool for evaluating handwriting skills. Our method might be useful in evaluating and supporting children with neurodevelopmental disorders, such as autism spectrum disorder, who are often affected by a lack of dexterity..
Indexed as
Identifiers
33024064PMC7837657W3092078538What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.