Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33024053›Full record

ArticlemSystems2020

End-to-End Protocol for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 from Built Environments.

Ceth W Parker, Nitin Singh, Scott Tighe, Adriana Blachowicz, Jason M Wood, Arman Seuylemezian, Parag Vaishampayan, Camilla Urbaniak, Ryan Hendrickson, Pheobe Laaguiby and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSystems, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in the workplace: Key findings from a rapid review of the literature.Aerosol science and technology : the journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 Decontamination and Containment in a COVID-19 ICU.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Ceth W Parker *NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4328-490X
Nitin Singh *NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5344-1190
Scott Tighe *Vermont Integrative Genomics Resource, Larner College of Medicine, The University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3988-0741
Adriana BlachowiczNASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9027-5670
Jason M WoodNASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0847-4695
Arman SeuylemezianNASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.
Parag VaishampayanNASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.
Camilla UrbaniakNASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.
Ryan HendricksonNASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.
Pheobe LaaguibyVermont Integrative Genomics Resource, Larner College of Medicine, The University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.
Kevin ClarkNASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.
Brian G ClementNASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4591-014X
Niamh B O'HaraBiotia, New York, New York, USA.
Mara Couto-RodriguezBiotia, New York, New York, USA.
Daniela BezdanWeill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, USA.
Christopher E MasonWeill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, USA.
Kasthuri VenkateswaranNASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA kasthuri.j.venkateswaran@jpl.nasa.gov.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6742-0873
Jet Propulsion Laboratory · USCornell University · USUniversity of Vermont · USBiotechnology Innovation Organization · USSUNY Downstate Health Sciences University · US

Funding

Defining the role of the RNA modification N6-methyladenosine in the hepatitis C virus lifecycleR01AI125416 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Stacy Michelle Horner · 2016 to 2026
$5.5M
Metagenomic profiling of urinary cell-free DNA to monitor urinary tract infection after kidney transplantationR01AI151059 · NIAID · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI DADHANIA, DARSHANA, DE VLAMINCK, IWIJN · 2020 to 2024
$3.4M
Mapping the RNA modification N6-methyladenosine during Zika virus infectionR21AI129851 · NIAID · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI HORNER, STACY MICHELLE, MASON, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD · 2017 to 2018
$469k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI125416NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI151059NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI129851
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019, is a respiratory virus primarily transmitted person to person through inhalation of droplets or aerosols, laden with viral particles. However, as recent studies have shown, virions can remain infectious for up to 72 h on surfaces, which can lead to transmission through contact. Thus, a comprehensive study was conducted to determine the efficiency of protocols to recover SARS-CoV-2 from surfaces in built environments. This end-to-end (E2E) study showed that the effective combination for monitoring SARS-CoV-2 on surfaces includes using an Isohelix swab collection tool, DNA/RNA Shield as a preservative, an automated system for RNA extraction, and reverse transcriptase quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) as the detection assay. Using this E2E approach, this study showed that, in some cases, noninfectious viral fragments of SARS-CoV-2 persisted on surfaces for as long as 8 days even after bleach treatment. Additionally, debris associated with specific built environment surfaces appeared to inhibit and negatively impact the recovery of RNA; Amerstat demonstrated the highest inhibition (>90%) when challenged with an inactivated viral control. Overall, it was determined that this E2E protocol required a minimum of 1,000 viral particles per 25 cm

Indexed as

built environmentscoronavirusCOVID-19end-to-endfomiteshigh-touch surfaceLAMPRT-qPCRSARS-CoV-2surface sampling

Identifiers

PMID33024053
PMCPMC7542562
OpenAlexW3092154115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.