Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33023920›Full record

Trial reportEvidence-based mental health2021

Linking the Mini-Mental State Examination, the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale and the Severe Impairment Battery: evidence from individual participant data from five randomised clinical trials of donepezil.

Stephen Z Levine, Kazufumi Yoshida, Yair Goldberg, Myrto Samara, Andrea Cipriani, Orestis Efthimiou, Takeshi Iwatsubo, Stefan Leucht, Toshi A Furukawa

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Evidence-based mental health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Carpe diem.Evidence-based mental health · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Stephen Z LevineDepartment of Community Mental Health, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel slevine@univ.haifa.ac.il.ORCID 0000-0002-5544-0420
Kazufumi YoshidaDepartment of Health Promotion and Human Behavior, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine/ School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4475-8043
Yair GoldbergFaculty of Industrial Engineering and Management, Haifa Technion, Haifa, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-4544-0910
Myrto SamaraDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6943-5091
Andrea CiprianiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5179-8321
Orestis EfthimiouInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0955-7572
Takeshi IwatsuboDepartment of Neuropathology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1160-8129
Stefan LeuchtDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4934-4352
Toshi A FurukawaDepartment of Health Promotion and Human Behavior, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine/ School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2159-3776

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) and the Severe Impairment Battery (SIB) are widely used rating scales to assess cognition in Alzheimer's disease.

objectiveTo understand the correspondence between these rating scales, we aimed to examine the linkage of MMSE with the ADAS-Cog and SIB total and change scores.

methodsWe used individual-level data on participants with Alzheimer's disease (n=2925) from five pivotal clinical trials of donepezil. Data were collected at baseline and scheduled visits for up to 6 months. We used equipercentile linking to identify the correspondence between simultaneous measurements of MMSE with ADAS-Cog, and SIB total and change ratings.

findingsSpearman's correlation coefficients were of strong magnitude between the MMSE total score and the ADAS-Cog (rs from -0.82 to -0.87; p<0.05) and SIB total scores (rs from 0.70 to 0.75; p<0.05). Weaker correlations between the change scores were observed between the MMSE change score and the ADAS-Cog (week 1: r=-0.11, p=0.18; rs thereafter: -0.28 to -0.45; p<0.05) and SIB change scores (rs from 0.31 to 0.44; p<0.05). Linking suggested that the MMSE total scores were sensitive to moderate and severe cognitive impairment levels. Despite weak to moderate correlations for the change scores, moderate change levels linked well, indicating ceiling and floor effects.

conclusionsThe current results can be used in meta-analyses, data harmonisation and may contribute to increasing statistical power when pooling data from multiple sources. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The current study results help clinicians to understand these cognitive rating scale scores.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognition DisordersCognitionDonepezilHumansNeuropsychological TestsDonepeziladult psychiatrydelirium & cognitive disorders

Identifiers

PMID33023920
PMCPMC10231617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.