Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33023667›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2020

Offering mental health first aid to a person after a potentially traumatic event: a Delphi study to redevelop the 2008 guidelines.

Kathryn J Chalmers, Anthony F Jorm, Claire M Kelly, Nicola J Reavley, Kathy S Bond, Fairlie A Cottrill, Judith Wright

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kathryn J ChalmersCentre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. kchalmers1@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8537-237X
Anthony F JormCentre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Claire M KellyMental Health First Aid Australia, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Nicola J ReavleyCentre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Kathy S BondMental Health First Aid Australia, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Fairlie A CottrillMental Health First Aid Australia, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Judith WrightCentre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
The University of Melbourne · AUMental Health Research Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTrauma has a major impact on the mental health and wellbeing of people globally. Friends, family and members of the public are often well positioned to provide initial assistance if someone is experiencing extreme distress following a potentially traumatic event. Expert consensus guidelines for high income, Western countries on how to do this were published in 2008. The aim of the current study was to re-develop these guidelines to ensure they are current and reflect best practice.

methodsThe Delphi consensus method was used to determine which helping statements should be included in the guidelines. Helping statements were derived from a systematic search of literature that considered how a member of the public could help someone experiencing extreme distress following a potentially traumatic event. Two expert panels, comprising 28 mental health professionals with expertise in managing trauma and 26 consumer advocates, rated each statement. Statements were accepted for inclusion in the guidelines if they were endorsed by at least 80% of each panel.

resultsOut of 183 statements, 103 were endorsed as appropriate helping actions in providing assistance to someone experiencing extreme distress following a potentially traumatic event. These statements were used to form the re-developed guidelines.

conclusionThis study has resulted in a more comprehensive set of guidelines than the original version, with the endorsement of 103 helping actions, compared to 65 previously. The updated guidelines better represent the complexities of experiencing trauma and the considered approach required when providing first aid after a potentially traumatic event. The additional guidance on providing initial assistance, talking about the trauma, offering short-term assistance and seeking appropriate professional help reflects current knowledge. A notable addition is the inclusion of content on how a first aider can assist after a disclosure of abuse. The guidelines are available to the public and will inform future updates of Mental Health First Aid training courses.

Indexed as

First AidGuidelines as TopicMental HealthConsensusDelphi TechniqueHumansStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticSurveys and QuestionnairesCommunity guidelinesDelphi methodExpert consensusHelping behaviourMental healthMental health first aidMental illnessPreventionTraumaTraumatic event

Identifiers

PMID33023667
PMCPMC7542436
OpenAlexW3092575841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.