Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33023509›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2020

Knowledge, skills and attitudes of older people and staff about getting up from the floor following a fall: a qualitative investigation.

Dawn R Swancutt, Suzy V Hope, Benjamin P Kent, Maria Robinson, Victoria A Goodwin

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06545539 (Does Participation in a Fall Preparedness Program Improve Fall Efficacy Among Older Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06545539 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Does Participation in a Fall Preparedness Program Improve Fall Efficacy Among Older Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorYoungstown State UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled30ConditionsFall Injury, Fall, Falls (Accidents) in Old AgeArmsFall Preparedness Exercise Class
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dawn R SwancuttUniversity of Plymouth, Plymouth, England.
Suzy V Hope, 2.05D South Cloisters, St Luke's Campus, Magdalen Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, England.
Benjamin P Kent, 2.05D South Cloisters, St Luke's Campus, Magdalen Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, England.
Maria RobinsonSouth Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, England.
Victoria A Goodwin, 2.05D South Cloisters, St Luke's Campus, Magdalen Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, England. v.goodwin@exeter.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-3860-9607
University of Exeter · GBSouth Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Plymouth · GB

Funding

South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust (GB) N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFalls are the most common reason for ambulance callouts resulting in non-conveyance. Even in the absence of injury, only half of those who fall can get themselves up off the floor, often remaining there over an hour, increasing risk of complications. There are recognized techniques for older people to learn how to get up after a fall, but these are rarely taught. The aim of this study was to develop an understanding of attitudes of older people, carers and health professionals on getting up following a fall.

methodsA qualitative focus group and semi-structured interviews were conducted with 28 participants, including community-dwelling older people with experience of a non-injurious fall, carers, physiotherapists, occupational therapists, paramedics and first responders. Data were transcribed and analysed systematically using the Framework approach. A stakeholder group of falls experts and service users advised during analysis.

resultsThe data highlighted three areas contributing to an individual's capability to get-up following a fall: the environment (physical and social); physical ability; and degree of self-efficacy (attitude and beliefs about their own ability). These factors fell within the wider context of making a decision about needing help, which included what training and knowledge each person already had to manage their fall response. Staff described how they balance their responsibilities, prioritising the individual's immediate needs; this leaves limited time to address capability in the aforementioned three areas. Paramedics, routinely responding to falls, only receive training on getting-up techniques from within their peer-group. Therapists are aware of the skillset to breakdown the getting-up process, but, with limited time, select who to teach these techniques to.

conclusionNeither therapists nor ambulance service staff routinely teach strategies on how to get up, meaning that healthcare professionals largely have a reactive role in managing falls. Interventions that address the environment, physical ability and self-efficacy could positively impact on peoples' capability to get up following a fall. Therefore, a more proactive approach would be to teach people techniques to manage these aspects of future falls and to provide them easily accessible information.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsAmbulancesAgedAged, 80 and overAttitudeFocus GroupsHumansIndependent LivingCapabilityFallsGetting upOlder peopleQualitativeRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID33023509
PMCPMC7542342
OpenAlexW3088361613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.