Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33023419›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2020

The multinomial index: a robust measure of reproductive skew.

Cody T Ross, Adrian V Jaeggi, Monique Borgerhoff Mulder, Jennifer E Smith, Eric Alden Smith, Sergey Gavrilets, Paul L Hooper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The ecology of ageing in wild societies: linking age structure and social behaviour.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Jeans and language: kin networks and reproductive success are associated with the adoption of outgroup norms.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Reproductive inequality among males in the genusPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  11. Mechanisms of equality and inequality in mammalian societies.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  12. Reproductive inequality in humans and other mammals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Sex bias in intergroup conflict and collective movements among social mammals: male warriors and female guides.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  15. The ecology of wealth inequality in animal societies.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Sociality and parasite transmission.Behavioral ecology and sociobiology · 2021
    Review
  18. Turnover in male dominance offsets the positive effect of polygyny on within-group relatedness.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cody T RossDepartment of Human Behavior, Ecology and Culture, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Adrian V JaeggiInstitute of Evolutionary Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Monique Borgerhoff MulderDepartment of Human Behavior, Ecology and Culture, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Jennifer E SmithDepartment of Biology, Mills College, Oakland, CA, USA.
Eric Alden SmithDepartment of Anthropology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Sergey GavriletsDepartments of Mathematics and Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Center for the Dynamics of Social Complexity, and National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Paul L HooperSanta Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inequality or skew in reproductive success (RS) is common across many animal species and is of long-standing interest to the study of social evolution. However, the measurement of inequality in RS in natural populations has been challenging because existing quantitative measures are highly sensitive to variation in group/sample size, mean RS, and age-structure. This makes comparisons across multiple groups and/or species vulnerable to statistical artefacts and hinders empirical and theoretical progress. Here, we present a new measure of reproductive skew, the multinomial index,

Indexed as

ReproductionSexual Behavior, AnimalAnimalsBiological EvolutionSocial Behaviorinequalitymating systemsphylogenetic comparative analysisreproductive skewsocial evolution

Identifiers

PMID33023419
PMCPMC7657858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.