Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33023400›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurotrauma2021

A Multi-Modal Assessment of Clinical Predictors for Traumatic Brain Injury End-Points.

Lin F Zou, Benjamin Pierce, Jessica L Nielson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurotrauma, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lin F ZouSchool of Statistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Benjamin PierceDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, and University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Jessica L NielsonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, and University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR002494 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R, WEISDORF, DANIEL J · 2018 to 2022
$34.9M
X-LINKED HYPOPHOSPHATEMIAM01RR000065 · NCRR · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI NESTLER, JOHN E · 1985 to 2010
$24.8M
Transforming Traumatic Brain Injury Research and Clinical CareRC2NS069409 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MANLEY, GEOFFREY T · 2009 to 2011
$4.3M
Bioinformatics for post-traumatic stressR01MH116156 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI NIELSON, JESSICA LEIGH · 2018 to 2022
$2.6M
Adding Legacy Clinical Data to the Federal Interagency Traumatic Brain Injury (FIR03NS088021 · NINDS · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI PAN, HUAQIN · 2014 to 2014
$147k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002494NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000065NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH116156NINDS NIH HHS R03 NS088021NINDS NIH HHS RC2 NS069409
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a complex injury that has a multi-faceted recovery process. The current "gold standard" for classifying severity of TBI symptoms is the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE), a crude measure of overall dysfunction after TBI. Exploratory factor analysis performed on TRACK-TBI Pilot (N = 297) identified candidate multi-variate outcome measures of neuropsychological impairment and cognitive speed and flexibility at 6 months post-TBI that were confirmed in data from the COBRIT study (N = 645) using confirmatory factor analysis. These new outcome measures were used as the dependent variables in an ordinal logistic regression model, using common data elements (CDE) collected in the emergency department as independent variables, including basic demographics, socioeconomic status, medical history, and measures of blood alcohol and blood pressure. We directly compared these prediction models with the GOSE as the 6-month outcome variable and found that in both the TRACK-TBI pilot and COBRIT studies, both neuropsychiatric complications (approx. 36.0% and 22.3% variance explained) and cognitive speed and flexibility (approx. 33.9% and 24.5% variance explained) were better explained by the prediction model, compared with GOSE (approx. 19.9% and 14.4% variance explained), respectively. While differences in overall distributions of impairment between TRACK-TBI pilot and COBRIT exist and should be explored further for applications of these prediction models, we think these multi-variate end-points more accurately characterize patients' functioning at six-months post-TBI. A multi-variate assessment of end-points seems especially important for characterizing TBI outcomes in cases where gross impairment, such as those measured by the GOSE, may be less evident.

Indexed as

Personal SatisfactionAdultBrain Injuries, TraumaticCognitionCognition DisordersFemaleGlasgow Outcome ScaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsOutcome Assessment, Health CarePrognosisReaction TimeYoung Adultcognitive functionhuman studiesneuropsychologyoutcome measurestraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID33023400
PMCPMC8020558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.