Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33023399›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2020

A comparison of metrics for quantifying cranial suture complexity.

Heather E White, Julien Clavel, Abigail S Tucker, Anjali Goswami

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Intertwined Evolution and Development of Sutures and Cranial Morphology.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  10. A comparison of metrics for quantifying cranial suture complexity.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Heather E WhiteDepartment of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, UK.
Julien ClavelDepartment of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, UK.
Abigail S TuckerCentre for Craniofacial and Regenerative Biology, King's College London SE1 9RT, UK.
Anjali GoswamiDepartment of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/ M009513/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M009513/1Wellcome Trust 102889/Z/13/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cranial sutures play critical roles in facilitating postnatal skull development and function. The diversity of function is reflected in the highly variable suture morphology and complexity. Suture complexity has seldom been studied, resulting in little consensus on the most appropriate approach for comparative, quantitative analyses. Here, we provide the first comprehensive comparison of current approaches for quantifying suture morphology, using a wide range of two-dimensional suture outlines across extinct and extant mammals (

Indexed as

Cranial SuturesAnimalsFractalsSkullSuturescomplexitymammalmorphologymorphometricsskullsuture

Identifiers

PMID33023399
PMCPMC7653371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.