ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Normal Percentiles for Respiratory Rate in Children-Reference Ranges Determined from an Optical Sensor.
Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient-Specific Size and Age Scaling in a Zero Dimensional Cardiovascular Model.ASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs : 1992) · 2026Article
- Non-Invasive Wearables in Pediatric Healthcare: A Comprehensive Review of Uses and Implications.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Severity Scale of Influenza and Acute Respiratory Illness Hospitalizations to Support Viral Genomic Surveillance: A Global Influenza Hospital Surveillance Network Pilot Study.Influenza and other respiratory viruses · 2025Article
- Respiratory rates among rural Gambian children: a community-based cohort study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
(1) Background: Increased respiratory rates (RRs) are described in several medical conditions, including pneumonia, bronchiolitis and asthma. There is variable methodology on how centiles for RR are derived in healthy children. Available age percentiles for RR have been generated using methods that have the potential themselves to alter the rate. (2) Methods: An optical respiratory sensor was used to measure RR. This technique enabled recording in awake children without the artefact of the observer's presence on the subject's RR. A cross-sectional sample of healthy children was obtained from maternity wards, childcare centres and schools in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. (3) Results: RRs were observed in 560 awake and 103 sleeping children of which data from 320 awake and 94 sleeping children were used to develop centile charts for children from birth to 13 years of age. RR is higher when children are awake compared to asleep. There were significant differences between awake and sleeping RR in young children. The awake median RR was 59.3 at birth and 25.4 at 3 years of age. In comparison, the median sleeping RR was 41.4 at birth and 22.0 at 3 years. (4) Conclusions: The centile charts will assist in determining abnormal RRs in children and will contribute to further systematic reviews related to this important vital sign. This is particularly in relation to the data on children aged from 0 to 3 years, where data are presented on both the awake and sleeping state. Many studies in the literature fail to acknowledge the impact of sleep state in young children on RR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.