ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020
Performance of Prognostic Scoring Systems in Trauma Patients in the Intensive Care Unit of a Trauma Center.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Intensive Psychological Nursing Intervention on HAMD and SF-36 Scores in Patients with Severe Liver Cancer in ICU.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Trial
- A different perspective in trauma patients: can pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) predict mortality?Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2026Article
- Limited Utility of the CALLY Index in Enhancing Mortality Prediction for Trauma Patients in Intensive Care Units: A Retrospective Analysis.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
- Observational
- Prognostic performance of ICU scoring systems in patients with HIV/AIDS: a retrospective analysis in the western Brazilian Amazon.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Review
- Comparison of Trauma Scoring Systems for Predicting Mortality in Emergency Department Patients with Traffic-Related Multiple Trauma.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Analysis of risk factors for death during treatment of hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Daily Improvement in APACHE II Score (APACHE/m) and Outcomes in ICU Trauma Patients.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025Article
- Delta shock index predicts injury severity, interventions, and outcomes in trauma patients: A 10-year retrospective observational study.World journal of critical care medicine · 2024Article
- Survival benefits of interventional radiology and surgical teams collaboration during primary trauma surveys: a single-centre retrospective cohort study.BMC emergency medicine · 2024Observational
- Multifaceted Analysis of the Environmental Factors in Severely Injured Trauma: A 30-Day Survival Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Scoring Systems to Evaluate the Mortality Risk of Patients with Emphysematous Cystitis: A Retrospective Observational Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- The Addition of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index to the Prognostic Scoring Systems Did Not Improve Mortality Prediction in Trauma Patients in the Intensive Care Unit.Emergency medicine international · 2023Article
- Using Second Measurement of De Ritis Ratio to Improve Mortality Prediction in Adult Trauma Patients in Intensive Care Unit.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- From Death Triad to Death Tetrad-The Addition of a Hypotension Component to the Death Triad Improves Mortality Risk Stratification in Trauma Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Dynamic Bayesian network for predicting physiological changes, organ dysfunctions and mortality risk in critical trauma patients.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Article
- Establishment of ICU Mortality Risk Prediction Models with Machine Learning Algorithm Using MIMIC-IV Database.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Applicability of Anatomic and Physiologic Scoring Systems for the Prediction of Outcome in Polytraumatized Patients with Blunt Aortic Injuries.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Association of Platelets and White Blood Cells Subtypes with Trauma Patients' Mortality Outcome in the Intensive Care Unit.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrediction of mortality outcomes in trauma patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) is important for patient care and quality improvement. We aimed to measure the performance of 11 prognostic scoring systems for predicting mortality outcomes in trauma patients in the ICU.
methodsProspectively registered data in the Trauma Registry System from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2018 were used to extract scores from prognostic scoring systems for 1554 trauma patients in the ICU. The following systems were used: the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS); the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II); the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II); mortality prediction models (MPM II) at admission, 24, 48, and 72 h; the Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score (MODS); the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA); the Logistic Organ Dysfunction Score (LODS); and the Three Days Recalibrated ICU Outcome Score (TRIOS). Predictive performance was determined according to the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC).
resultsMPM II at 24 h had the highest AUC (0.9213), followed by MPM II at 48 h (AUC: 0.9105). MPM II at 24, 48, and 72 h (0.8956) had a significantly higher AUC than the TRISS (AUC: 0.8814), APACHE II (AUC: 0.8923), SAPS II (AUC: 0.9044), MPM II at admission (AUC: 0.9063), MODS (AUC: 0.8179), SOFA (AUC: 0.7073), LODS (AUC: 0.9013), and TRIOS (AUC: 0.8701). There was no significant difference in the predictive performance of MPM II at 24 and 48 h (
conclusionsWe compared 11 prognostic scoring systems and demonstrated that MPM II at 24 h had the best predictive performance for 1554 trauma patients in the ICU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.