Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33023207›Full record

ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2020

The Potential of Payment for Ecosystem Services for Crop Wild Relative Conservation.

Nicholas Tyack, Hannes Dempewolf, Colin K Khoury

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Frontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Conservation Genomics of Wild Red Sage (Frontiers in genetics · 2021
    Article
  12. Plant Biodiversity and Genetic Resources Matter!Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicholas TyackGraduate Institute of International and Development Studies, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0037-2977
Hannes DempewolfGlobal Crop Diversity Trust, 53113 Bonn, Germany.
Colin K KhouryInternational Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Cali 6713, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-7893-5744

Funding

Fulbright Program N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crop wild relatives (CWR) have proven to be very valuable in agricultural breeding programs but remain a relatively under-utilized and under-protected resource. CWR have provided resistance to pests and diseases, abiotic stress tolerance, quality improvements and yield increases with the annual contribution of these traits to agriculture estimated at USD 115 billion globally and are considered to possess many valuable traits that have not yet been explored. The use of the genetic diversity found in CWR for breeding provides much-needed resilience to modern agricultural systems and has great potential to help sustainably increase agricultural production to feed a growing world population in the face of climate change and other stresses. A number of CWR taxa are at risk, however, necessitating coordinated local, national, regional and global efforts to preserve the genetic diversity of these plants through complementary

Indexed as

agricultural adaptationagrobiodiversity conservationclimate changecrop wild relativespayment for ecosystem servicespayment for environmental services

Identifiers

PMID33023207
PMCPMC7601374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.