Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33023098›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2020

Genome-Wide Characterization and Comparative Analyses of Simple Sequence Repeats among Four Miniature Pig Breeds.

Hongyang Wang, Yang Fu, Peng Gu, Yingying Zhang, Weilong Tu, Zhe Chao, Huali Wu, Jianguo Cao, Xiang Zhou, Bang Liu and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Genome-Wide Microsatellites inAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Genes · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Hongyang WangInstitute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Science, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201106, China.
Yang FuResearch Institute of Edible Fungi, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China.
Peng GuInstitute of Comparative Medicine & Laboratory Animal Management Center, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China.
Yingying ZhangInstitute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Science, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201106, China.
Weilong TuInstitute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Science, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201106, China.
Zhe ChaoInstitute of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Hainan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571100, China.
Huali WuInstitute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Science, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201106, China.
Jianguo CaoInstitute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Science, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201106, China.
Xiang ZhouKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding, and Reproduction of Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.
Bang LiuKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding, and Reproduction of Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.
Jennifer J MichalDepartment of Animal Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA.
Chun FanShanghai Laboratory Animal Research Center, Shanghai 201203, China.
Yongsong TanInstitute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Science, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201106, China.
Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNHuazhong Agricultural University · CNHainan Provincial Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNSouthern Medical University · CNWashington State University · US

Funding

Hainan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China 2019RC358National Natural Science Foundation of China 31900416Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China 2019M651548Shanghai Committee of Science and Technology 18140900501The Youth Talent Development Plan of Shanghai Municipal Agricultural System 20180124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Simple sequence repeats (SSRs) are commonly used as molecular markers in research on genetic diversity and discrimination among taxa or breeds because polymorphisms in these regions contribute to gene function and phenotypically important traits. In this study, we investigated genome-wide characteristics, repeat units, and polymorphisms of SSRs using sequencing data from SSR-enriched libraries created from Wuzhishan (WZS), Bama (BM), inbred Luchuan (LC) and Zangxiang (ZX) miniature pig breeds. The numbers and types of SSRs, distributions of repeat units and polymorphic SSRs varied among the four breeds. Compared to the Duroc pig reference genome, 2518 polymorphic SSRs were unique and common to all four breeds and functional annotation revealed that they may affect the coding and regulatory regions of genes. Several examples, such as

Indexed as

length polymorphismminiature pigmolecular markerrepeat unitSSR

Identifiers

PMID33023098
PMCPMC7600727
OpenAlexW3090942832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.