ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Mechanical Considerations of Electrospun Scaffolds for Myocardial Tissue and Regenerative Engineering.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Mechanical tunability of oriented and random electrospun poly(ε-caprolactone) scaffolds via concentration, molecular weight, and environment.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Form Meets Function: Fiber Architecture Directs Proliferation and Differentiation in Gingival Keratinocytes.Cells · 2026Article
- Large-Area Flexible Photopolymerized Scaffolds: Fabrication and Application to Cardiomyocytes.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2026Article
- Cardiac Repair and Regeneration via Advanced Technology: Narrative Literature Review.JMIR biomedical engineering · 2025Review
- Biogenic polymer based patches for congenital cardiac surgery: future development of implants.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Optimization of Polycaprolactone and Type I Collagen Scaffold for Tendon Tissue Regeneration.Cureus · 2024Article
- Exploring Electrospun Scaffold Innovations in Cardiovascular Therapy: A Review of Electrospinning in Cardiovascular Disease.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Cardiac tissue engineering: an emerging approach to the treatment of heart failure.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- A Heart Rate Matched Patch for Mechano-Chemical Treatment of Myocardial Infarction: Optimal Design and Transspecies Application.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2024Article
- Three-Dimensionally Printed Hydrogel Cardiac Patch for Infarct Regeneration Based on Natural Polysaccharides.Polymers · 2023Article
- Recent Advances in Tissue-Engineered Cardiac Scaffolds-The Progress and Gap in Mimicking Native Myocardium Mechanical Behaviors.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Review
- Recent Tissue Engineering Approaches to Mimicking the Extracellular Matrix Structure for Skin Regeneration.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Development of Scaffolds from Bio-Based Natural Materials for Tissue Regeneration Applications: A Review.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Biomechanics Assist Measurement, Modeling, Engineering Applications, and Clinical Decision Making in Medicine.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Artificial Scaffolds in Cardiac Tissue Engineering.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Optimization of Salt-Leaching Parameters for Gelatin/NaPolymers · 2022Article
- Biomimetic design of bioartificial scaffolds for theFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Bioengineering lungs: An overview of current methods, requirements, and challenges for constructing scaffolds.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Passive myocardial mechanical properties: meaning, measurement, models.Biophysical reviews · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biomaterials to facilitate the restoration of cardiac tissue is of emerging importance. While there are many aspects to consider in the design of biomaterials, mechanical properties can be of particular importance in this dynamically remodeling tissue. This review focuses on one specific processing method, electrospinning, that is employed to generate materials with a fibrous microstructure that can be combined with material properties to achieve the desired mechanical behavior. Current methods used to fabricate mechanically relevant micro-/nanofibrous scaffolds, in vivo studies using these scaffolds as therapeutics, and common techniques to characterize the mechanical properties of the scaffolds are covered. We also discuss the discrepancies in the reported elastic modulus for physiological and pathological myocardium in the literature, as well as the emerging area of in vitro mechanobiology studies to investigate the mechanical regulation in cardiac tissue engineering. Lastly, future perspectives and recommendations are offered in order to enhance the understanding of cardiac mechanobiology and foster therapeutic development in myocardial regenerative medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.