Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33022852›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2020

Optimal duration of prior endocrine therapy predicts the efficacy of Fulvestrant in a real-world study for patients with hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.

Yannan Zhao, Yi Li, Chengcheng Gong, Yizhao Xie, Jian Zhang, Leiping Wang, Jun Cao, Zhonghua Tao, Biyun Wang, Xichun Hu

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03708432 (An Observational, Retrospective Study of 500mg Fulvestrant in Hormone Receptor+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03708432 completednot on this map

An Observational, Retrospective Study of 500mg Fulvestrant in Hormone Receptor+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer

TypeobservationalSponsorFudan UniversityRan2017 to 2018Enrolled100ConditionsBreast Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Rat Models of Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yannan ZhaoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Yi LiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Chengcheng GongDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Yizhao XieDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Jian ZhangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Leiping WangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Jun CaoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Zhonghua TaoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Biyun WangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7829-1544
Xichun HuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fulvestrant 500 mg is standard of care for endocrine therapy-naive or pretreated women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). This study was conducted to explore the potential factors and duration of last endocrine therapy as predictors for the efficacy of fulvestrant 500 mg on Chinese patients in real-world practice. Two hundred and fifty-two MBC patients who were treated with fulvestrant 500 mg consecutively between January 2011 and December 2015 in our institute were included in this study. Efficacy outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and clinical benefit rate (CBR). The optimal cut-off value for duration of last endocrine therapy was determined by survival ROC analysis. Adverse events were graded according to NCI-CTC AE 4.0. Fulvestrant 500 mg demonstrated a median PFS of 5.8 months (95%CI 4.6-6.9), and a median OS of 35.9 months (95%CI 30.2-41.4). CBR was 41.3% (95%CI 35-47). Liver metastasis, bone alone metastasis, lines of endocrine therapy for MBC, and sensitivity to last endocrine therapy were statistically significant in the Cox multivariate analysis (P values of 0.022, 0.02, 0.03, and 0.038, respectively). The optimal cut-off values for duration of last endocrine therapy to predict the efficacy of fulvestrant 500 mg were 25.08 months for adjuvant endocrine therapy and 5.17 months for first-line endocrine therapy, which showed no difference in prediction power with ABC clinical definition. Patients with prior adjuvant endocrine therapy ≥25.08 months or first-line therapy≥5.17 months reached a longer PFS of fulvestrant (p = 0.04). Six patients discontinued the treatment due to intolerable adverse events. Patients with the duration of prior endocrine therapy longer than optimal cut-off points indicate better PFS of fulvestrant. Liver metastasis, bone alone metastasis, line of fulvestrant, and sensitivity to last endocrine therapy were also predictors for response of fulvestrant. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03708432.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBone NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsChinaDisease ProgressionDuration of TherapyErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesEstrogen Receptor AntagonistsFemaleFulvestrantHumansLiver NeoplasmsMiddle AgedAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesEstrogen Receptor AntagonistsFulvestrantReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesteronefulvestranthormone receptor-positivemetastatic breast cancerreal-world effectiveness

Identifiers

PMID33022852
PMCPMC7724295
OpenAlexW3092027127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.