Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33022773›Full record

ArticleHeadache2020

Development and Internal Validation of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Episodic Migraine Attacks Based on Daily Trigger Exposures.

Katherine K Holsteen, Michael Hittle, Meredith Barad, Lorene M Nelson

Open access · greenAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Headache, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katherine K HolsteenDepartment of Epidemiology & Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Michael HittleDepartment of Epidemiology & Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Meredith BaradDepartment of Anesthesia, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Lorene M NelsonDepartment of Epidemiology & Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Stanford University · US

Funding

Stanford Center for Clinical & Translational Education and Research (Spectrum)UL1TR003142 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI O'HARA, RUTH M · 2019 to 2023
$45.0M
Spectrum Stanford Center for clinical and Translational Research and EducationUL1TR001085 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CULLEN, MARK RICHARD, GREENBERG, HARRY BERNARD · 2013 to 2017
$37.1M
Stanford BSSR Pre-Doctoral Training Program at the Intersection of Data Sciences with Behavioral, Social, and Population Health ResearchT32HL151323 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Michelle Christina Odden, David H Rehkopf · 2020 to 2026
$1.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001085NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003142NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL151323Stanford Discovery Innovation Fund in Basic Biomedical Sciences
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop and internally validate a multivariable predictive model for days with new-onset migraine headaches based on patient self-prediction and exposure to common trigger factors.

backgroundAccurate real-time forecasting of one's daily risk of migraine attack could help episodic migraine patients to target preventive medications for susceptible time periods and help decrease the burden of disease. Little is known about the predictive utility of common migraine trigger factors.

methodsWe recruited adults with episodic migraine through online forums to participate in a 90-day prospective daily-diary cohort study conducted through a custom research application for iPhone. Every evening, participants answered questions about migraine occurrence and potential predictors including stress, sleep, caffeine and alcohol consumption, menstruation, and self-prediction. We developed and estimated multivariable multilevel logistic regression models for the risk of a new-onset migraine day vs a healthy day and internally validated the models using repeated cross-validation.

resultsWe had 178 participants complete the study and qualify for the primary analysis which included 1870 migraine events. We found that a decrease in caffeine consumption, higher self-predicted probability of headache, a higher level of stress, and times within 2 days of the onset of menstruation were positively associated with next-day migraine risk. The multivariable model predicted migraine risk only slightly better than chance (within-person C-statistic: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.54, 0.58).

conclusionsIn this study, episodic migraine attacks were not predictable based on self-prediction or on self-reported exposure to common trigger factors. Improvements in accuracy and breadth of data collection are needed to build clinically useful migraine prediction models.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalSelf ReportAdultDiaries as TopicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMigraine DisordersPrognosisProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsRiskforecastheadachemigrainepredicttrigger

Identifiers

PMID33022773
PMCPMC9645460
OpenAlexW3092104956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.