Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33022690›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Behavioral and corticosterone responses to carbon dioxide exposure in reptiles.

Daniel J D Natusch, Patrick W Aust, Syarifah Khadiejah, Hartini Ithnin, Ain Isa, Che Ku Zamzuri, Andre Ganswindt, Dale F DeNardo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Daniel J D NatuschDepartment of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3275-518X
Patrick W AustDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Syarifah KhadiejahDepartment of Wildlife and National Parks, Peninsular Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Hartini IthninDepartment of Wildlife and National Parks, Peninsular Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Ain IsaDepartment of Wildlife and National Parks, Peninsular Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Che Ku ZamzuriDepartment of Wildlife and National Parks, Peninsular Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Andre GanswindtEndocrine Research Laboratory, Mammal Research Institute, Department of Zoology and Entomology, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-1474-7602
Dale F DeNardoSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America.
Arizona State University · USOnderstepoort Veterinary Academic Hospital · ZARural Training Initiatives · AUUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of carbon dioxide (CO2) exposure as a means of animal euthanasia has received considerable attention in mammals and birds but remains virtually untested in reptiles. We measured the behavioral responses of four squamate reptile species (Homalopsis buccata, Malayopython reticulatus, Python bivitattus, and Varanus salvator) to exposure to 99.5% CO2 for durations of 15, 30, or 90 minutes. We also examined alterations in plasma corticosterone levels of M. reticulatus and V. salvator before and after 15 minutes of CO2 exposure relative to control individuals. The four reptile taxa showed consistent behavioral responses to CO2 exposure characterized by gaping and minor movements. The time taken to lose responsiveness to stimuli and cessation of movements varied between 240-4260 seconds (4-71 minutes), with considerable intra- and inter-specific variation. Duration of CO2 exposure influenced the likelihood of recovery, which also varied among species (e.g., from 0-100% recovery after 30-min exposure). Plasma corticosterone concentrations increased after CO2 exposure in both V. salvator (18%) and M. reticulatus (14%), but only significantly in the former species. Based on our results, CO2 appears to be a mild stressor for reptiles, but the relatively minor responses to CO2 suggest it may not cause considerable distress or pain. However, our results are preliminary, and further testing is required to understand optimal CO2 delivery mechanisms and interspecific responses to CO2 exposure before endorsing this method for reptile euthanasia.

Indexed as

MovementAnimalsCarbon DioxideCorticosteroneReptilesCarbon DioxideCorticosterone

Identifiers

PMID33022690
PMCPMC7538201
OpenAlexW3092627768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.