Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33022293›Full record

ReviewInfectious diseases now2021

Clinical trial protocols of repurposed prophylaxis for COVID-19: A review.

E Sallard, D Belhadi, F-X Lescure, Y Yazdanpanah, N Peiffer-Smadja

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Infectious diseases now, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

E SallardÉcole normale supérieure de Paris, 45, rue D'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France; Department of Human Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten-Herdecke University, 58453 Witten, Germany. Electronic address: erwan.sallard@ens.psl.eu.
D BelhadiUniversité de Paris, INSERM, IAME, 75006 Paris, France.
F-X LescureUniversité de Paris, INSERM, IAME, 75006 Paris, France; Bichat-Claude Bernard University Hospital, AP-HP, 75018 Paris, France.
Y YazdanpanahUniversité de Paris, INSERM, IAME, 75006 Paris, France; Bichat-Claude Bernard University Hospital, AP-HP, 75018 Paris, France.
N Peiffer-SmadjaUniversité de Paris, INSERM, IAME, 75006 Paris, France; Bichat-Claude Bernard University Hospital, AP-HP, 75018 Paris, France; National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficient therapeutic strategies are needed to counter the COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. In a context where specific vaccines are not yet available, the containment of the pandemic would be facilitated with efficient prophylaxis. We screened several clinical trials repositories and platforms in search of the prophylactic strategies being investigated against COVID-19 in July 2020. Up to July 5, 2020, only one clinical trial result was published, although we found 112 clinical trial protocols targeting medical workers (n=70, 63%), patients relatives (n=20, 18%) or individuals at risk of severe COVID-19 (n=14, 13%). (Hydroxy)chloroquine was the most frequently evaluated treatment (n=69, 62%), before BCG vaccine (n=12, 11%), this followed by numerous antivirals and immune enhancers. Ninety-eight (88%) clinical trials were randomized with a median of planned inclusions of 530 (IQR 258-1299). Both pre- and post-exposure prophylaxes are investigated.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicPost-Exposure ProphylaxisPre-Exposure ProphylaxisClinical ProtocolsCOVID-19HumansSARS-CoV-2COVID-19ProphylaxisRepurposed chemotherapySARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33022293
PMCPMC7532748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.