Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33022266›Full record

ReviewCurrent biology : CB2020

The Recovery, Interpretation and Use of Ancient Pathogen Genomes.

Sebastián Duchêne, Simon Y W Ho, Ann G Carmichael, Edward C Holmes, Hendrik Poinar

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current biology : CB, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Leprosy in the Americas before Columbus.Nature ecology & evolution · 2025
    Article
  10. Genetic Evidence ofGenes · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Pathogen prospecting of museums: Reconstructing malaria epidemiology.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Sebastián DuchêneDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia. Electronic address: sebastian.duchene@unimelb.edu.au.
Simon Y W HoSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Ann G CarmichaelHistory Department, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Edward C HolmesMarie Bashir Institute for Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, School of Life and Environmental Sciences and School of Medical Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. Electronic address: edward.holmes@sydney.edu.au.
Hendrik PoinarMcMaster Ancient DNA Centre, Departments of Anthropology and Biochemistry, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. W., Hamilton, ON L8S 4L9, Canada; Michael G. DeGroote Institute for Infectious Disease Research, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. W., Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada; Humans and the Microbiome Program, Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Toronto, Canada. Electronic address: poinarh@mcmaster.ca.
University of Sydney · AUIndiana University Bloomington · USMcMaster University · CAUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to sequence genomes from ancient biological material has provided a rich source of information for evolutionary biology and engaged considerable public interest. Although most studies of ancient genomes have focused on vertebrates, particularly archaic humans, newer technologies allow the capture of microbial pathogens and microbiomes from ancient and historical human and non-human remains. This coming of age has been made possible by techniques that allow the preferential capture and amplification of discrete genomes from a background of predominantly host and environmental DNA. There are now near-complete ancient genome sequences for three pathogens of considerable historical interest - pre-modern bubonic plague (Yersinia pestis), smallpox (Variola virus) and cholera (Vibrio cholerae) - and for three equally important endemic human disease agents - Mycobacterium tuberculosis (tuberculosis), Mycobacterium leprae (leprosy) and Treponema pallidum pallidum (syphilis). Genomic data from these pathogens have extended earlier work by paleopathologists. There have been efforts to sequence the genomes of additional ancient pathogens, with the potential to broaden our understanding of the infectious disease burden common to past populations from the Bronze Age to the early 20

Indexed as

AnimalsBacteriaBiological EvolutionDNA, AncientDNA, BacterialEvolution, MolecularGenomeGenome, BacterialGenomicsHumansMicrobiotaMycobacterium lepraeMycobacterium tuberculosisPhylogenyTreponemaVariola virusDNA, AncientDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID33022266
PMCPMC7534838
OpenAlexW3092384753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.