Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33022051›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2021

Discovery of Ongoing Selective Sweeps within Anopheles Mosquito Populations Using Deep Learning.

Alexander T Xue, Daniel R Schrider, Andrew D Kern, Ag1000g Consortium

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The persistence and loss of hard selective sweeps amid admixture in ancient Eurasians.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexander T XueSimons Center for Quantitative Biology, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
Daniel R SchriderDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Andrew D KernInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, 5289 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR.
Ag1000g Consortium

Funding

Deep learning for population geneticsR01HG010774 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI ANDREW D KERN · 2020 to 2026
$3.2M
POPULATION GENOMICS OF ADAPTATIONR01GM117241 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI KERN, ANDREW D · 2017 to 2020
$1.2M
Inferring selection from human population genomic dataK99HG008696 · NHGRI · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI SCHRIDER, DANIEL R · 2016 to 2017
$121k
NHGRI NIH HHS K99 HG008696NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG010774NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM117241Wellcome Trust 109917/Z/15/ZWellcome Trust 204911/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification of partial sweeps, which include both hard and soft sweeps that have not currently reached fixation, provides crucial information about ongoing evolutionary responses. To this end, we introduce partialS/HIC, a deep learning method to discover selective sweeps from population genomic data. partialS/HIC uses a convolutional neural network for image processing, which is trained with a large suite of summary statistics derived from coalescent simulations incorporating population-specific history, to distinguish between completed versus partial sweeps, hard versus soft sweeps, and regions directly affected by selection versus those merely linked to nearby selective sweeps. We perform several simulation experiments under various demographic scenarios to demonstrate partialS/HIC's performance, which exhibits excellent resolution for detecting partial sweeps. We also apply our classifier to whole genomes from eight mosquito populations sampled across sub-Saharan Africa by the Anopheles gambiae 1000 Genomes Consortium, elucidating both continent-wide patterns as well as sweeps unique to specific geographic regions. These populations have experienced intense insecticide exposure over the past two decades, and we observe a strong overrepresentation of sweeps at insecticide resistance loci. Our analysis thus provides a list of candidate adaptive loci that may be relevant to mosquito control efforts. More broadly, our supervised machine learning approach introduces a method to distinguish between completed and partial sweeps, as well as between hard and soft sweeps, under a variety of demographic scenarios. As whole-genome data rapidly accumulate for a greater diversity of organisms, partialS/HIC addresses an increasing demand for useful selection scan tools that can track in-progress evolutionary dynamics.

Indexed as

Deep LearningSelection, GeneticAnimalsAnophelesGenome, InsectInsecticide Resistanceconvolutional neural networksmachine learningpartial sweepspopulation genomicsselective sweeps

Identifiers

PMID33022051
PMCPMC7947845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.