Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33022040›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2021

Divergence and Remarkable Diversity of the Y Chromosome in Guppies.

Pedro Almeida, Benjamin A Sandkam, Jake Morris, Iulia Darolti, Felix Breden, Judith E Mank

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
12.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Sex Chromosome Evolution: Hallmarks and Question Marks.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Some thoughts about the words we use for thinking about sex chromosome evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  16. Are plant and animal sex chromosomes really all that different?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Pedro AlmeidaDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Benjamin A SandkamDepartment of Zoology and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Jake MorrisDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Iulia DaroltiDepartment of Zoology and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Felix BredenDepartment of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Judith E MankDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
University of British Columbia · CAUniversity College London · GBSimon Fraser University · CA

Funding

European Research Council 680951
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The guppy sex chromosomes show an extraordinary diversity in divergence across populations and closely related species. In order to understand the dynamics of the guppy Y chromosome, we used linked-read sequencing to assess Y chromosome evolution and diversity across upstream and downstream population pairs that vary in predator and food abundance in three replicate watersheds. Based on our population-specific genome assemblies, we first confirmed and extended earlier reports of two strata on the guppy sex chromosomes. Stratum I shows significant accumulation of male-specific sequence, consistent with Y divergence, and predates the colonization of Trinidad. In contrast, Stratum II shows divergence from the X, but no Y-specific sequence, and this divergence is greater in three replicate upstream populations compared with their downstream pair. Despite longstanding assumptions that sex chromosome recombination suppression is achieved through inversions, we find no evidence of inversions associated with either Stratum I or Stratum II. Instead, we observe a remarkable diversity in Y chromosome haplotypes within each population, even in the ancestral Stratum I. This diversity is likely due to gradual mechanisms of recombination suppression, which, unlike an inversion, allow for the maintenance of multiple haplotypes. In addition, we show that this Y diversity is dominated by low-frequency haplotypes segregating in the population, suggesting a link between haplotype diversity and female preference for rare Y-linked color variation. Our results reveal the complex interplay between recombination suppression and Y chromosome divergence at the earliest stages of sex chromosome divergence.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionY ChromosomeAnimalsFemaleHaplotypesMalePoeciliaPolymorphism, Geneticlinked-readsPoecilia reticulatarecombination suppressionsex chromosomesY haplotypes

Identifiers

PMID33022040
PMCPMC7826173
OpenAlexW3091930560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.