Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33022023›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

COVID-SCORE: A global survey to assess public perceptions of government responses to COVID-19 (COVID-SCORE-10).

Jeffrey V Lazarus, Scott Ratzan, Adam Palayew, Francesco C Billari, Agnes Binagwaho, Spencer Kimball, Heidi J Larson, Alessia Melegaro, Kenneth Rabin, Trenton M White and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 110 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
110citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

110 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Views of Nigerian civil servants about compulsory COVID-19 vaccination: A qualitative study.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

50 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jeffrey V LazarusBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9618-2299
Scott RatzanGraduate School of Public Health & Health Policy, City University of New York (CUNY), New York, New York, United States of America.
Adam PalayewBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Francesco C BillariDepartment of Social and Political Science, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy.
Agnes BinagwahoUniversity of Global Health Equity, Kigali, Rwanda.ORCID 0000-0002-6779-3151
Spencer KimballEmerson College, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Heidi J LarsonLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Alessia MelegaroDepartment of Social and Political Science, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy.
Kenneth RabinGraduate School of Public Health & Health Policy, City University of New York (CUNY), New York, New York, United States of America.
Trenton M WhiteBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Ayman El-MohandesGraduate School of Public Health & Health Policy, City University of New York (CUNY), New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9538-9220

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding public perceptions of government responses to COVID-19 may foster improved public cooperation. Trust in government and population risk of exposure may influence public perception of the response. Other population-level characteristics, such as country socio-economic development, COVID-19 morbidity and mortality, and degree of democratic government, may influence perception. METHODS AND

findingsWe developed a novel ten-item instrument that asks respondents to rate key aspects of their government's response to the pandemic (COVID-SCORE). We examined whether the results varied by gender, age group, education level, and monthly income. We also examined the internal and external validity of the index using appropriate predefined variables. To test for dimensionality of the results, we used a principal component analysis (PCA) for the ten survey items. We found that Cronbach's alpha was 0.92 and that the first component of the PCA explained 60% of variance with the remaining factors having eigenvalues below 1, strongly indicating that the tool is both reliable and unidimensional. Based on responses from 13,426 people randomly selected from the general population in 19 countries, the mean national scores ranged from 35.76 (Ecuador) to 80.48 (China) out of a maximum of 100 points. Heterogeneity in responses was observed across age, gender, education and income with the greatest amount of heterogeneity observed between countries. National scores correlated with respondents' reported levels of trust in government and with country-level COVID-19 mortality rates.

conclusionsThe COVID-SCORE survey instrument demonstrated satisfactory validity. It may help governments more effectively engage constituents in current and future efforts to control COVID-19. Additional country-specific assessment should be undertaken to measure trends over time and the public perceptions of key aspects of government responses in other countries.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusGovernmentPublic OpinionResearch DesignSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentAdultAgedChinaCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesEcuadorFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID33022023
PMCPMC7538106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.