Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33021993›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Impact of peripheral artery disease on short-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: A report from Japanese nationwide registry.

Takayuki Ishihara, Kyohei Yamaji, Osamu Iida, Shun Kohsaka, Taku Inohara, Toshiro Shinke, Hirohiko Ando, Tetsuya Amano, Yasushi Sakata, Toshiaki Mano and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Impact of extracardiac vascular disease on outcomes of 1.4 million patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Takayuki IshiharaKansai Rosai Hospital Cardiovascular Center, Amagasaki, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7505-0817
Kyohei YamajiDepartment of Cardiology, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Osamu IidaKansai Rosai Hospital Cardiovascular Center, Amagasaki, Japan.
Shun KohsakaDepartment of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Taku InoharaDepartment of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshiro ShinkeDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hirohiko AndoDepartment of Cardiology, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, Japan.
Tetsuya AmanoDepartment of Cardiology, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, Japan.
Yasushi SakataDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Toshiaki ManoKansai Rosai Hospital Cardiovascular Center, Amagasaki, Japan.
Yuji IkariDepartment of Cardiology, Tokai University Hospital, Isehara, Japan.
Kansai Rosai Hospital · JPAichi Medical University · JPKeio University · JPKokura Memorial Hospital · JPShowa University · JPThe University of Osaka · JPTokai University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atherosclerosis is a systemic process. As the population ages, increasingly more patients who undergo coronary revascularization are complicated with peripheral artery disease (PAD). However, the large body of evidence in this area has not been limited to analysis from trial-based data from younger and relatively uncomplicated patients in Western countries. The impact of PAD on the outcomes can differ by patient characteristics, and integrated analysis of large-scale data is necessary. J-PCI is a universal (all-comer) nationwide registration system in Japan, regulated and audited by professional society that controls national board-certification system. For the present study, we extracted data of 894,014 percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) cases performed between 2014 and 2017 (mean age 70.2 years [standard deviation 11.0]). In-hospital outcomes of PAD and Non-PAD patients were compared. PAD was defined as a previous history of stenosis of peripheral arteries or abdominal aortic aneurysm. Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, and multivariable modeling was performed. A total of 66,891 patients (8.1%) had PAD. Crude in-hospital mortality rate was higher in this group (0.99% vs. 0.67% in Non-PAD group). PAD was associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.383 [95% confidence interval 1.251-1.528]). However, the impact of PAD differed by kidney condition (OR 1.578 [1.370-1.821] for patients with chronic kidney disease [CKD] and OR 1.234 [1.076-1.416] without CKD: P for interaction 0.005), and by clinical presentation: PAD was not associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing PCI for silent ischemia (OR 1.211 [0.8701-1.685]: P for interaction 0.002). Presence of PAD was independently associated with in-hospital mortality in patients receiving PCI. However, its impact varied substantially by the patient background or indication of the procedure.

Indexed as

Percutaneous Coronary InterventionAgedDatabases, FactualFemaleHospital MortalityHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioPeripheral Arterial DiseaseRegistriesRenal Insufficiency, ChronicRisk FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID33021993
PMCPMC7537874
OpenAlexW3091915704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.