Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33021988›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Metagenome analysis from the sediment of river Ganga and Yamuna: In search of beneficial microbiome.

Bijay Kumar Behera, Biswanath Patra, Hirak Jyoti Chakraborty, Parameswar Sahu, Ajaya Kumar Rout, Dhruba Jyoti Sarkar, Pranaya Kumar Parida, Rohan Kumar Raman, Atmakuri Ramakrishna Rao, Anil Rai and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Investigation of anti-microbial and cytotoxic potential of Streptomyces werraensis GRS9 derived from the sediments of river Ganga.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Bacterial diversity in the aquatic system in India based on metagenome analysis-a critical review.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bijay Kumar BeheraAquatic Environmental Biotechnology and Nanotechnology Division, ICAR-Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, Barrackpore, West Bengal, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4960-9768
Biswanath PatraAquatic Environmental Biotechnology and Nanotechnology Division, ICAR-Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, Barrackpore, West Bengal, India.
Hirak Jyoti ChakrabortyAquatic Environmental Biotechnology and Nanotechnology Division, ICAR-Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, Barrackpore, West Bengal, India.
Parameswar SahuAquatic Environmental Biotechnology and Nanotechnology Division, ICAR-Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, Barrackpore, West Bengal, India.
Ajaya Kumar RoutAquatic Environmental Biotechnology and Nanotechnology Division, ICAR-Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, Barrackpore, West Bengal, India.
Dhruba Jyoti SarkarAquatic Environmental Biotechnology and Nanotechnology Division, ICAR-Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, Barrackpore, West Bengal, India.
Pranaya Kumar ParidaAquatic Environmental Biotechnology and Nanotechnology Division, ICAR-Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, Barrackpore, West Bengal, India.
Rohan Kumar RamanAquatic Environmental Biotechnology and Nanotechnology Division, ICAR-Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, Barrackpore, West Bengal, India.
Atmakuri Ramakrishna RaoIndian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India.
Anil RaiICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Basanta Kumar DasAquatic Environmental Biotechnology and Nanotechnology Division, ICAR-Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, Barrackpore, West Bengal, India.
Joykrushna JenaIndian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India.
Trilochan MohapatraIndian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India.
Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute · INIndian Council of Agricultural Research · INIndian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Beneficial microbes are all around us and it remains to be seen, whether all diseases and disorders can be prevented or treated with beneficial microbes. In this study, the presence of various beneficial bacteria were identified from the sediments of Indian major Rivers Ganga and Yamuna from nine different sites using a metagenomic approach. The metagenome sequence analysis using the Kaiju Web server revealed the presence of 69 beneficial bacteria. Phylogenetic analysis among these bacterial species revealed that they were highly diverse. Relative abundance analysis of these bacterial species is highly correlated with different pollution levels among the sampling sites. The PCA analysis revealed that Lactobacillus spp. group of beneficial bacteria are more associated with sediment sampling sites, KAN-2 and ND-3; whereas Bacillus spp. are more associated with sites, FAR-2 and ND-2. This is the first report revealing the richness of beneficial bacteria in the Indian rivers, Ganga and Yamuna. The study might be useful in isolating different important beneficial microorganisms from these river sediments, for possible industrial applications.

Indexed as

MetagenomeBacteriaDNA, BacterialGeologic SedimentsIndiaMicrobiotaPhylogenyRiversWater MicrobiologyDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID33021988
PMCPMC7537857
OpenAlexW3092611331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.