Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33021822›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of cell and developmental biology2020

Synthetic Developmental Biology: Understanding Through Reconstitution.

Gavin Schlissel, Pulin Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of cell and developmental biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Tissue Engineering with Mechanically Induced Solid-Fluid Transitions.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gavin SchlisselWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA.
Pulin LiWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA.

Funding

Spatio-Temporal Signaling Dynamics in Neuronal Cell Fate Decision and PatterningR00HD087532 · NICHD · WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RES · PI LI, PULIN · 2019 to 2021
$736k
NICHD NIH HHS R00 HD087532
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reconstitution is an experimental strategy that seeks to recapitulate biological events outside their natural contexts using a reduced set of components. Classically, biochemical reconstitution has been extensively applied to identify the minimal set of molecules sufficient for recreating the basic chemistry of life. By analogy, reconstitution approaches to developmental biology recapitulate aspects of developmental events outside an embryo, with the goal of revealing the basic genetic circuits or physical cues sufficient for recreating developmental decisions. The rapidly growing repertoire of genetic, molecular, microscopic, and bioengineering tools is expanding the complexity and precision of reconstitution experiments. We review the emerging field of synthetic developmental biology, with a focus on the ways in which reconstitution strategies and new biological tools have enhanced our modern understanding of fundamental questions in developmental biology.

Indexed as

Developmental BiologySynthetic BiologyCell LineageCell SizeHumansTime Factorsembryo developmentgenetic circuitsreconstitutionspatiotemporal dynamicssynthetic biology

Identifiers

PMID33021822
PMCPMC8139837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.