ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2021
Evaluation of cardiac functions after catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia
Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/aim: Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) is the most effective method of supraventricular tachycardia therapy. Recurrent supraventricular tachycardia causes systolic dysfunction and dilated cardiomyopathy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term alterations of atrial and ventricular functions after RFAof typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Materials and methods: This cross-sectional study included 55 consecutive patients with symptomatic drug-resistant AVNRT who had had an invasive electrophysiology study and RFA. Speckle-tracking–based echocardiographic assessment was performed shortly before and 1 year after the operation. Left ventricle (LV) and right ventricle (RV) peak systolic strain (PSS) and atrial strain measurements were performed. Results: RFA successfully eliminatedtachyarrhythmia in all patients. LV apical 4-chamber PSS –20.8% (–24.7 to –16.0) vs. –22.8% (–26.6 to –17.0, P < 0.001), LV apical 2-chamber PSS –21.5% (–26.8 to –10.1) vs. –22.0% (–27.8 to –13.7, P < 0.001), LV global PSS –20.4% (–26.4 to –14.4) vs. –23.0% (–27.1 to –2.3, P < 0.001), RV global PSS –26.0% (–30.0 to –18.0) vs. –26.5% (–32.1 to –19.7, P < 0.001), and peak left atrial longitudinal strain 41.0% (19.0–71.8) vs. 54.0% (25.6–82.0, P < 0.001) were significantly improved 1 year after RFA. Conclusion: RFA of AVNRT not only provides relief of palpitations but also improves cardiac functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.