ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2020
[Chimeric antigen receptors in oncology: clinical applications and new developments].
Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Lentiviral and adeno-associated vectors efficiently transduce mouse T lymphocytes when targeted to murine CD8.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2021Article
- Combining T-cell-specific activation and in vivo gene delivery through CD3-targeted lentiviral vectors.Blood advances · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In 2018, two novel cancer therapies based on chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) were granted marketing authorization in the European Union. Authorized for use against advanced lymphoma and/or leukemia, the products were at the center of international attention, not only due to their novel mode of action and their encouraging efficacy but also because of their sometimes severe side effects and the economic and logistic challenges posed by their manufacture. Now, almost two years later, hundreds of active clinical trials emphasize the global drive to harness the full potential of CAR technology.In this article, we describe the mode of action of CAR T and CAR NK cells and review the clinical testing situation as well as early real-world data. In recent years, preclinical studies using advanced animal models have provided first insights into the mechanisms underlying the severe side effects of CAR T therapy. We summarize their results and describe the available models. Additionally, we discuss potential solutions to the hurdles currently limiting CAR technology. So far used as last-line treatment for patients with aggressive disease, CAR technology has the potential to become a new, broadly effective standard for tumor therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.