Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33021679›Full record

ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2020

[Chimeric antigen receptors in oncology: clinical applications and new developments].

Alexander Michels, Jessica Hartmann, Christian J Buchholz

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexander MichelsPaul-Ehrlich-Institut, Paul-Ehrlich-Str. 51-59, 63225, Langen, Deutschland.
Jessica HartmannPaul-Ehrlich-Institut, Paul-Ehrlich-Str. 51-59, 63225, Langen, Deutschland.
Christian J BuchholzPaul-Ehrlich-Institut, Paul-Ehrlich-Str. 51-59, 63225, Langen, Deutschland. christian.buchholz@pei.de.
Paul Ehrlich Institut · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2018, two novel cancer therapies based on chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) were granted marketing authorization in the European Union. Authorized for use against advanced lymphoma and/or leukemia, the products were at the center of international attention, not only due to their novel mode of action and their encouraging efficacy but also because of their sometimes severe side effects and the economic and logistic challenges posed by their manufacture. Now, almost two years later, hundreds of active clinical trials emphasize the global drive to harness the full potential of CAR technology.In this article, we describe the mode of action of CAR T and CAR NK cells and review the clinical testing situation as well as early real-world data. In recent years, preclinical studies using advanced animal models have provided first insights into the mechanisms underlying the severe side effects of CAR T therapy. We summarize their results and describe the available models. Additionally, we discuss potential solutions to the hurdles currently limiting CAR technology. So far used as last-line treatment for patients with aggressive disease, CAR technology has the potential to become a new, broadly effective standard for tumor therapy.

Indexed as

Receptors, Chimeric AntigenAnimalsGermanyHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveMedical OncologyReceptors, Antigen, T-CellT-LymphocytesReceptors, Antigen, T-CellReceptors, Chimeric AntigenATMPCARGenetically modified cellsHematologic malignanciesImmunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID33021679
PMCPMC7648004
OpenAlexW3089987308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.