Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33021483›Full record

Observational studyJMIR mHealth and uHealth2020

Smartphone-Enabled, Telehealth-Based Family Conferences in Palliative Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Pilot Observational Study.

Yu-Rui Wu, Tzu-Jung Chou, Yi-Jen Wang, Jaw-Shiun Tsai, Shao-Yi Cheng, Chien-An Yao, Jen-Kuei Peng, Wen-Yu Hu, Tai-Yuan Chiu, Hsien-Liang Huang

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Shared Decision-Making with Palliative Care Specialist.Journal of hospice and palliative care · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yu-Rui WuDepartment of Family Medicine, Taitung Christian Hospital, Taitung, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-4497-837X
Tzu-Jung ChouDepartment of Family Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-6576-1199
Yi-Jen WangDepartment of Family Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-5494-4611
Jaw-Shiun TsaiDepartment of Family Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-5227-8894
Shao-Yi ChengDepartment of Family Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-2224-4140
Chien-An YaoDepartment of Family Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-8074-6379
Jen-Kuei PengDepartment of Family Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-9997-9842
Wen-Yu HuDepartment of Nursing, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-5244-2458
Tai-Yuan ChiuDepartment of Family Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-8528-7981
Hsien-Liang HuangDepartment of Family Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-2163-5596
National Taiwan University Hospital · TWPingtung Christian Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the palliative care setting, infection control measures implemented due to COVID-19 have become barriers to end-of-life care discussions (eg, discharge planning and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments) between patients, their families, and multidisciplinary medical teams. Strict restrictions in terms of visiting hours and the number of visitors have made it difficult to arrange in-person family conferences. Phone-based telehealth consultations may be a solution, but the lack of nonverbal cues may diminish the clinician-patient relationship. In this context, video-based, smartphone-enabled family conferences have become important.

objectiveWe aimed to establish a smartphone-enabled telehealth model for palliative care family conferences. Our model integrates principles from the concept of shared decision making (SDM) and the value, acknowledge, listen, understand, and elicit (VALUE) approach.

methodsFamily conferences comprised three phases designed according to telehealth implementation guidelines-the previsit, during-visit, and postvisit phases. We incorporated the following SDM elements into the model: "team talk," "option talk," and "decision talk." The model has been implemented at a national cancer treatment center in Taiwan since February 2020.

resultsFrom February to April 2020, 14 telehealth family conferences in the palliative care unit were analyzed. The patients' mean age was 73 (SD 10.1) years; 6 out of 14 patients (43%) were female and 12 (86%) were married. The primary caregiver joining the conference virtually comprised mostly of spouses and children (n=10, 71%). The majority of participants were terminally ill patients with cancer (n=13, 93%), with the exception of 1 patient with stroke. Consensus on care goals related to discharge planning and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments was reached in 93% (n=13) of cases during the family conferences. In total, 5 families rated the family conferences as good or very good (36%), whereas 9 were neutral (64%).

conclusionsSmartphone-enabled telehealth for palliative care family conferences with SDM and VALUE integration demonstrated high satisfaction for families. In most cases, it was effective in reaching consensus on care decisions. The model may be applied to other countries to promote quality in end-of-life care in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

CommunicationPandemicsProfessional-Family RelationsSmartphoneAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPalliative CarePilot ProjectsPneumonia, ViralCOVID-19end-of-life carefamily conferencemobile phonepalliative careshared decision makingsmartphonetelehealth

Identifiers

PMID33021483
PMCPMC7595749
OpenAlexW3091472835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.