Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33021156›Full record

ArticleCognitive behaviour therapy2021

Working memory moderates the predictive influence of distress intolerance on health-related goal attainment.

Hayley E Fitzgerald, Eugenia I Gorlin, Michael W Otto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive behaviour therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hayley E FitzgeraldDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University , Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3545-0146
Eugenia I GorlinDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University , Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0219-901X
Michael W OttoDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University , Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8915-7578

Funding

Engaging Working Memory and Distress Tolerance to Aid Smoking CessationR21DA046963 · NIDA · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI OTTO, MICHAEL W. · 2018 to 2019
$475k
NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA046963
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High distress intolerance (DI: often assessed as anxiety sensitivity) and low working memory capacity (WMC) have each been identified as risk factors for negative health behaviors. To our knowledge, these risk factors have only been studied independently. The current study investigated both the independent and interactive effects of DI and WMC in predicting health-related goal attainment in 118 undergraduates who self-selected a health-related goal. Participants received one of three interventions: values clarification, action planning, or a combination of the two. Across these interventions, we found that DI was at the point of significance (and reflected a small effect size) for predicting goal attainment, whereas WMC was not. Further, we found that when entered into the stepwise regression model together, the interaction of WMC and DI significantly predicted goal success one week later. Specifically, for individuals scoring one standard deviation below the mean in WMC, having worse DI significantly predicted worse goal attainment one week later. We believe this study represents the first published finding of the moderation of the predictive influence of DI by WMC, and underscores the importance of evaluating how risk factors that are typically examined independently operate together.

Indexed as

GoalsHealth BehaviorMemory, Short-TermAnxietyFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultanxiety sensitivityDistress tolerancegoal settinghealth behaviorsworking memory

Identifiers

PMID33021156
PMCPMC7897207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.