Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33021030›Full record

ArticleMolecular oncology2021

Tackling the cancer burden: the economic impact of primary prevention policies.

Jane Cheatley, Alexandra Aldea, Aliénor Lerouge, Marion Devaux, Sabine Vuik, Michele Cecchini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Burden of occupational cancer in Brazil and federative units, 1990-2019.Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jane CheatleyHealth Division, Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, France.
Alexandra AldeaHealth Division, Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, France.
Aliénor LerougeHealth Division, Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, France.
Marion DevauxHealth Division, Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, France.
Sabine VuikHealth Division, Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, France.
Michele CecchiniHealth Division, Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3650-6241
Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Economiques · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is a noncommunicable disease (NCD) with increasing incidence and therefore constitutes a major public health issue. To reduce the health and economic burden of cancer, policy-makers across the world have implemented a range of preventative interventions targeting risk factors with a known link to the disease. In this article, we examine the impact of six primary prevention interventions - related to physical inactivity, unhealthy diet or harmful alcohol use - on cancer-related health outcomes and healthcare expenditure. Here, we used the OECD Strategic Public Health Planning for NCDs (SPHeP-NCDs) model to quantify outcomes and costs for each intervention for years 2020-2050 across 37 countries. Results from the model indicate that all interventions could lead to a reduction in the number of new cancer cases, in particular those targeting harmful alcohol consumption. Introducing an alcohol tax, for instance, is estimated to reduce related cancer cases by 5619 a year or 174 193 by 2050. A breakdown of results by type of cancer revealed interventions had the largest impact on colorectal cancer with, on average, 41 140 cases avoided per intervention by 2050. In proportional terms, interventions had the greatest impact on new oesophageal and liver cancers. Findings from this article are designed to assist decision-makers efficiently allocate limited resources to meet public health objectives.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCost of IllnessFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsNoncommunicable DiseasesPublic HealthRisk Factorsalcoholcancerhealthcare expenditurenoncommunicable diseasesobesityprojection

Identifiers

PMID33021030
PMCPMC7931126
OpenAlexW3091307233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.