ArticleMedical physics2020
Deep-learning-based direct inversion for material decomposition.
Article in Medical physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Model-based motion simulation framework for deep learning-assisted motion correction in dynamic wrist CT.Physics in medicine and biology · 2026Article
- Moiré fringes of photon counting grating interferometer with single-focal-spot and flat-panel X-ray sources.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Clinical benefits and current challenges of photon-counting detector CT in vascular imaging.Radiology advances · 2026Review
- Voxel-wise deep learning segmentation of hydroxyapatite and iodine in spectral photon-counting CT: A quantitative phantom study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Dual-Head Pix2Pix Network for Material Decomposition of Conventional CT Projections with Photon-Counting Guidance.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Multi-Material Decomposition Using Spectral Diffusion Posterior Sampling.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2025Article
- Photon-counting in dual-contrast-enhanced computed tomography: a proof-of-concept quantitative biomechanical assessment of articular cartilage.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Systematic Review on Learning-based Spectral CT.ArXiv · 2024Article
- Image-domain material decomposition for dual-energy CT using unsupervised learning with data-fidelity loss.Medical physics · 2024Article
- CT Material Decomposition using Spectral Diffusion Posterior Sampling.Conference proceedings. International Conference on Image Formation in X-Ray Computed Tomography · 2024Article
- Multi-energy CT material decomposition using graph model improved CNN.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2024Article
- Systematic Review on Learning-based Spectral CT.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2024Article
- Towards full-stack deep learning-empowered data processing pipeline for synchrotron tomography experiments.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2024Review
- Imaging of Multiple Myeloma: Present and Future.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Deep learning-based material decomposition of iodine and calcium in mobile photon counting detector CT.PloS one · 2024Article
- A quality-checked and physics-constrained deep learning method to estimate material basis images from single-kV contrast-enhanced chest CT scans.Medical physics · 2023Article
- Deep learning-based virtual noncalcium imaging in multiple myeloma using dual-energy CT.Medical physics · 2022Article
- Small animal photon counting cone-beam CT on a preclinical radiation research platform to improve radiation dose calculation accuracy.Physics in medicine and biology · 2022Article
- Material decomposition from photon-counting CT using a convolutional neural network and energy-integrating CT training labels.Physics in medicine and biology · 2022Article
- Dual-Contrast Biphasic Liver Imaging With Iodine and Gadolinium Using Photon-Counting Detector Computed Tomography: An Exploratory Animal Study.Investigative radiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) that can directly estimate material density distribution from multi-energy computed tomography (CT) images without performing conventional material decomposition.
methodsThe proposed CNN (denoted as Incept-net) followed the general framework of encoder-decoder network, with an assumption that local image information was sufficient for modeling the nonlinear physical process of multi-energy CT. Incept-net was implemented with a customized loss function, including an in-house-designed image-gradient-correlation (IGC) regularizer to improve edge preservation. The network consisted of two types of customized multibranch modules exploiting multiscale feature representation to improve the robustness over local image noise and artifacts. Inserts with various densities of different materials [hydroxyapatite (HA), iodine, a blood-iodine mixture, and fat] were scanned using a research photon-counting detector (PCD) CT with two energy thresholds and multiple radiation dose levels. The network was trained using phantom image patches only, and tested with different-configurations of full field-of-view phantom and in vivo porcine images. Furthermore, the nominal mass densities of insert materials were used as the labels in CNN training, which potentially provided an implicit mass conservation constraint. The Incept-net performance was evaluated in terms of image noise, detail preservation, and quantitative accuracy. Its performance was also compared to common material decomposition algorithms including least-square-based material decomposition (LS-MD), total-variation regularized material decomposition (TV-MD), and U-net-based method.
resultsIncept-net improved accuracy of the predicted mass density of basis materials compared with the U-net, TV-MD, and LS-MD: the mean absolute error (MAE) of iodine was 0.66, 1.0, 1.33, and 1.57 mgI/cc for Incept-net, U-net, TV-MD, and LS-MD, respectively, across all iodine-present inserts (2.0-24.0 mgI/cc). With the LS-MD as the baseline, Incept-net and U-net achieved comparable noise reduction (both around 95%), both higher than TV-MD (85%). The proposed IGC regularizer effectively helped both Incept-net and U-net to reduce image artifact. Incept-net closely conserved the total mass densities (i.e., mass conservation constraint) in porcine images, which heuristically validated the quantitative accuracy of its outputs in anatomical background. In general, Incept-net performance was less dependent on radiation dose levels than the two conventional methods; with approximately 40% less parameters, the Incept-net achieved relatively improved performance than the comparator U-net, indicating that performance gain by Incept-net was not achieved by simply increasing network learning capacity.
conclusionIncept-net demonstrated superior qualitative image appearance, quantitative accuracy, and lower noise than the conventional methods and less sensitive to dose change. Incept-net generalized and performed well with unseen image structures and different material mass densities. This study provided preliminary evidence that the proposed CNN may be used to improve the material decomposition quality in multi-energy CT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.