Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33020942›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2020

Deep-learning-based direct inversion for material decomposition.

Hao Gong, Shengzhen Tao, Kishore Rajendran, Wei Zhou, Cynthia H McCollough, Shuai Leng

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Multi-Material Decomposition Using Spectral Diffusion Posterior Sampling.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. CT Material Decomposition using Spectral Diffusion Posterior Sampling.Conference proceedings. International Conference on Image Formation in X-Ray Computed Tomography · 2024
    Article
  11. Multi-energy CT material decomposition using graph model improved CNN.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2024
    Article
  12. Systematic Review on Learning-based Spectral CT.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Imaging of Multiple Myeloma: Present and Future.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hao GongDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55901, USA.
Shengzhen TaoDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55901, USA.
Kishore RajendranDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55901, USA.
Wei ZhouDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55901, USA.
Cynthia H McColloughDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55901, USA.
Shuai LengDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55901, USA.
Mayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Florida · US

Funding

Trade-offs in human observer performance, image quality metrics, and patient doseR01EB017095 · NIBIB · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Hao Gong, Cynthia H McCollough · 2012 to 2026
$7.0M
Photon-Counting Spectral CT to Reduce Dose and Detect Early Vascular DiseaseR01EB016966 · NIBIB · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI MCCOLLOUGH, CYNTHIA H · 2013 to 2017
$5.1M
Comprehensive characterization of coronary atherosclerotic disease using photon-counting-detector dual-source CT and its impact on patient managementR01EB028590 · NIBIB · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI LENG, SHUAI, MCCOLLOUGH, CYNTHIA H · 2020 to 2023
$2.6M
Mayo Clinic from Siemens AGMayo Clinic X-ray Imaging CoreNIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB016966NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB017095NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB028590NIH HHS EB028590NIH HHS R01 EB016966NVIDIA CorporationSiemens AG
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) that can directly estimate material density distribution from multi-energy computed tomography (CT) images without performing conventional material decomposition.

methodsThe proposed CNN (denoted as Incept-net) followed the general framework of encoder-decoder network, with an assumption that local image information was sufficient for modeling the nonlinear physical process of multi-energy CT. Incept-net was implemented with a customized loss function, including an in-house-designed image-gradient-correlation (IGC) regularizer to improve edge preservation. The network consisted of two types of customized multibranch modules exploiting multiscale feature representation to improve the robustness over local image noise and artifacts. Inserts with various densities of different materials [hydroxyapatite (HA), iodine, a blood-iodine mixture, and fat] were scanned using a research photon-counting detector (PCD) CT with two energy thresholds and multiple radiation dose levels. The network was trained using phantom image patches only, and tested with different-configurations of full field-of-view phantom and in vivo porcine images. Furthermore, the nominal mass densities of insert materials were used as the labels in CNN training, which potentially provided an implicit mass conservation constraint. The Incept-net performance was evaluated in terms of image noise, detail preservation, and quantitative accuracy. Its performance was also compared to common material decomposition algorithms including least-square-based material decomposition (LS-MD), total-variation regularized material decomposition (TV-MD), and U-net-based method.

resultsIncept-net improved accuracy of the predicted mass density of basis materials compared with the U-net, TV-MD, and LS-MD: the mean absolute error (MAE) of iodine was 0.66, 1.0, 1.33, and 1.57 mgI/cc for Incept-net, U-net, TV-MD, and LS-MD, respectively, across all iodine-present inserts (2.0-24.0 mgI/cc). With the LS-MD as the baseline, Incept-net and U-net achieved comparable noise reduction (both around 95%), both higher than TV-MD (85%). The proposed IGC regularizer effectively helped both Incept-net and U-net to reduce image artifact. Incept-net closely conserved the total mass densities (i.e., mass conservation constraint) in porcine images, which heuristically validated the quantitative accuracy of its outputs in anatomical background. In general, Incept-net performance was less dependent on radiation dose levels than the two conventional methods; with approximately 40% less parameters, the Incept-net achieved relatively improved performance than the comparator U-net, indicating that performance gain by Incept-net was not achieved by simply increasing network learning capacity.

conclusionIncept-net demonstrated superior qualitative image appearance, quantitative accuracy, and lower noise than the conventional methods and less sensitive to dose change. Incept-net generalized and performed well with unseen image structures and different material mass densities. This study provided preliminary evidence that the proposed CNN may be used to improve the material decomposition quality in multi-energy CT.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAlgorithmsAnimalsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerPhantoms, ImagingSwineTomography, X-Ray Computedconvolutional neural networkdeep learningmaterial decompositionmulti-energy CTphoton-counting detector CT

Identifiers

PMID33020942
PMCPMC7796910
OpenAlexW3089678347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.