Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33020614›Full record

ReviewNature materials2020

Water electrolysers with closed and open electrochemical systems.

Marie Francine Lagadec, Alexis Grimaud

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature materials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Investigating Synthetic Dolomite Mixtures and Phase Adjustment Parameters in Electrochemical Cement Precursor Production.Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marie Francine LagadecChimie du Solide et de l'Energie, Collège de France, UMR 8260, Paris, France. marie-francine.lagadec@college-de-france.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6214-5171
Alexis GrimaudChimie du Solide et de l'Energie, Collège de France, UMR 8260, Paris, France. alexis.grimaud@college-de-france.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9966-205X

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (French National Research Agency) ANR-10-LABX-0076Agence Nationale de la Recherche (French National Research Agency) ANR-17-CE05-0008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Green hydrogen production using renewables-powered, low-temperature water electrolysers is crucial for rapidly decarbonizing the industrial sector and with it many chemical transformation processes. However, despite decades of research, advances at laboratory scale in terms of catalyst design and insights into underlying processes have not resulted in urgently needed improvements in water electrolyser performance or higher deployment rates. In light of recent developments in water electrolyser devices with modified architectures and designs integrating concepts from Li-ion or redox flow batteries, we discuss practical challenges hampering the scaling-up and large-scale deployment of water electrolysers. We highlight the role of device architectures and designs, and how engineering concepts deserve to be integrated into fundamental research to accelerate synergies between materials science and engineering, and also to achieve industry-scale deployment. New devices require benchmarking and assessment in terms of not only their performance metrics, but also their scalability and deployment potential.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.