Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33020567›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Health anxiety and attentional bias toward virus-related stimuli during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Loreta Cannito, Adolfo Di Crosta, Rocco Palumbo, Irene Ceccato, Stefano Anzani, Pasquale La Malva, Riccardo Palumbo, Alberto Di Domenico

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Changing Decisions: The Interaction between Framing and Decoy Effects.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Loreta Cannito *Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University G. D'Annunzio of Chieti-Pescara, 66100, Chieti Scalo, Italy. loreta.cannito@unich.it.
Adolfo Di Crosta *Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University G. D'Annunzio of Chieti-Pescara, 66100, Chieti Scalo, Italy.
Rocco PalumboDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Health and Territory, University G. D'Annunzio of Chieti-Pescara, 66100, Chieti Scalo, Italy.
Irene CeccatoDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University G. D'Annunzio of Chieti-Pescara, 66100, Chieti Scalo, Italy.
Stefano AnzaniDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University G. D'Annunzio of Chieti-Pescara, 66100, Chieti Scalo, Italy.
Pasquale La MalvaDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Health and Territory, University G. D'Annunzio of Chieti-Pescara, 66100, Chieti Scalo, Italy.
Riccardo PalumboDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University G. D'Annunzio of Chieti-Pescara, 66100, Chieti Scalo, Italy.
Alberto Di DomenicoDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Health and Territory, University G. D'Annunzio of Chieti-Pescara, 66100, Chieti Scalo, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After the COVID-19 worldwide spread, evidence suggested a vast diffusion of negative consequences on people's mental health. Together with depression and sleep difficulties, anxiety symptoms seem to be the most diffused clinical outcome. The current contribution aimed to examine attentional bias for virus-related stimuli in people varying in their degree of health anxiety (HA). Consistent with previous literature, it was hypothesized that higher HA would predict attentional bias, tested using a visual dot-probe task, to virus-related stimuli. Participants were 132 Italian individuals that participated in the study during the lockdown phase in Italy. Results indicated that the HA level predicts attentional bias toward virus-related objects. This relationship is double mediated by the belief of contagion and by the consequences of contagion as assessed through a recent questionnaire developed to measure the fear for COVID-19. These findings are discussed in the context of cognitive-behavioral conceptualizations of anxiety suggesting a risk for a loop effect. Future research directions are outlined.

Indexed as

AttentionAdultAnxietyCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19FearFemaleHumansItalyMalePandemicsPneumonia, ViralPsychological Tests

Identifiers

PMID33020567
PMCPMC7536432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.