Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33020507›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Task-based memory systems in contextual-cueing of visual search and explicit recognition.

Thomas Geyer, Pardis Rostami, Lisa Sogerer, Bernhard Schlagbauer, Hermann J Müller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Learning to suppress a distractor may not be unconscious.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thomas GeyerDepartment Psychologie, Lehrstuhl für Allgemeine Und Experimentelle Psychologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Leopoldstraße 13, 80802, München, Germany. geyer@lmu.de.
Pardis RostamiDepartment Psychologie, Lehrstuhl für Allgemeine Und Experimentelle Psychologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Leopoldstraße 13, 80802, München, Germany.
Lisa SogererDepartment Psychologie, Lehrstuhl für Allgemeine Und Experimentelle Psychologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Leopoldstraße 13, 80802, München, Germany.
Bernhard SchlagbauerDepartment Psychologie, Lehrstuhl für Allgemeine Und Experimentelle Psychologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Leopoldstraße 13, 80802, München, Germany.
Hermann J MüllerDepartment Psychologie, Lehrstuhl für Allgemeine Und Experimentelle Psychologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Leopoldstraße 13, 80802, München, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual search is facilitated when observers encounter targets in repeated display arrangements. This 'contextual-cueing' (CC) effect is attributed to incidental learning of spatial distractor-target relations. Prior work has typically used only one recognition measure (administered after the search task) to establish whether CC is based on implicit or explicit memory of repeated displays, with the outcome depending on the diagnostic accuracy of the test. The present study compared two explicit memory tests to tackle this issue: yes/no recognition of a given search display as repeated versus generation of the quadrant in which the target (which was replaced by a distractor) had been located during the search task, thus closely matching the processes involved in performing the search. While repeated displays elicited a CC effect in the search task, both tests revealed above-chance knowledge of repeated displays, though explicit-memory accuracy and its correlation with contextual facilitation in the search task were more pronounced for the generation task. These findings argue in favor of a one-system, explicit-memory account of CC. Further, they demonstrate the superiority of the generation task for revealing the explicitness of CC, likely because both the search and the memory task involve overlapping processes (in line with 'transfer-appropriate processing').

Indexed as

AdultAttentionCuesFemaleHumansLearningMaleMemoryPattern Recognition, VisualReaction TimeRecognition, PsychologySpace Perception

Identifiers

PMID33020507
PMCPMC7536208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.