Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33020430›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Real-Time Fruit Recognition and Grasping Estimation for Robotic Apple Harvesting.

Hanwen Kang, Hongyu Zhou, Xing Wang, Chao Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
20.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 176 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Gripping Success Metric for Robotic Fruit Harvesting.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hanwen KangLaboratory of Motion Generation and Analysis, Faculty of Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.
Hongyu ZhouLaboratory of Motion Generation and Analysis, Faculty of Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.
Xing WangLaboratory of Motion Generation and Analysis, Faculty of Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.
Chao ChenLaboratory of Motion Generation and Analysis, Faculty of Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.
Monash University · AU

Funding

ARC Nanocomm Hub ARC ITRH IH150100006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robotic harvesting shows a promising aspect in future development of agricultural industry. However, there are many challenges which are still presented in the development of a fully functional robotic harvesting system. Vision is one of the most important keys among these challenges. Traditional vision methods always suffer from defects in accuracy, robustness, and efficiency in real implementation environments. In this work, a fully deep learning-based vision method for autonomous apple harvesting is developed and evaluated. The developed method includes a light-weight one-stage detection and segmentation network for fruit recognition and a PointNet to process the point clouds and estimate a proper approach pose for each fruit before grasping. Fruit recognition network takes raw inputs from RGB-D camera and performs fruit detection and instance segmentation on RGB images. The PointNet grasping network combines depth information and results from the fruit recognition as input and outputs the approach pose of each fruit for robotic arm execution. The developed vision method is evaluated on RGB-D image data which are collected from both laboratory and orchard environments. Robotic harvesting experiments in both indoor and outdoor conditions are also included to validate the performance of the developed harvesting system. Experimental results show that the developed vision method can perform highly efficient and accurate to guide robotic harvesting. Overall, the developed robotic harvesting system achieves 0.8 on harvesting success rate and cycle time is 6.5 seconds.

Indexed as

agricultural robotautonomous harvestingdeep learninggrasping estimationpointNetrobotic harvesting

Identifiers

PMID33020430
PMCPMC7583839
OpenAlexW3091091831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.