Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33020270›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Rational combination therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with PARP1 and DNA-PK inhibitors.

Chen Wang, Huanyin Tang, Anke Geng, Binghua Dai, Haiping Zhang, Xiaoxiang Sun, Yu Chen, Zhibing Qiao, Hong Zhu, Jiamei Yang and 10 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Novel Techniques for Mapping DNA Damage and Repair in the Brain.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Chen WangClinical and Translational Research Center of Shanghai First Maternity & Infant Hospital, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, Frontier Science Center for Stem Cell Research, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2931-7856
Huanyin TangClinical and Translational Research Center of Shanghai First Maternity & Infant Hospital, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, Frontier Science Center for Stem Cell Research, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China.
Anke GengClinical and Translational Research Center of Shanghai First Maternity & Infant Hospital, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, Frontier Science Center for Stem Cell Research, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China.
Binghua DaiDepartment of Special Treatment and Liver Transplantation, Shanghai Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Shanghai 200438, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3139-5749
Haiping ZhangClinical and Translational Research Center of Shanghai First Maternity & Infant Hospital, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, Frontier Science Center for Stem Cell Research, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China.
Xiaoxiang SunClinical and Translational Research Center of Shanghai First Maternity & Infant Hospital, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, Frontier Science Center for Stem Cell Research, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China.
Yu ChenClinical and Translational Research Center of Shanghai First Maternity & Infant Hospital, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, Frontier Science Center for Stem Cell Research, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9661-3914
Zhibing QiaoClinical and Translational Research Center of Shanghai First Maternity & Infant Hospital, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, Frontier Science Center for Stem Cell Research, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China.
Hong ZhuCollege of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China.
Jiamei YangDepartment of Special Treatment and Liver Transplantation, Shanghai Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Shanghai 200438, China.
Jiayu ChenClinical and Translational Research Center of Shanghai First Maternity & Infant Hospital, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, Frontier Science Center for Stem Cell Research, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China.
Qizhi HeClinical and Translational Research Center of Shanghai First Maternity & Infant Hospital, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, Frontier Science Center for Stem Cell Research, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China.
Nan QinClinical and Translational Research Center of Shanghai First Maternity & Infant Hospital, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, Frontier Science Center for Stem Cell Research, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China.
Jinru XieKey Laboratory of Molecular Radiation Oncology Hunan Province, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China.
Rong TanKey Laboratory of Molecular Radiation Oncology Hunan Province, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China.
Xiaoping WanClinical and Translational Research Center of Shanghai First Maternity & Infant Hospital, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, Frontier Science Center for Stem Cell Research, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China.
Shaorong GaoClinical and Translational Research Center of Shanghai First Maternity & Infant Hospital, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, Frontier Science Center for Stem Cell Research, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1041-3928
Ying JiangClinical and Translational Research Center of Shanghai First Maternity & Infant Hospital, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, Frontier Science Center for Stem Cell Research, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; ying_jiang@tongji.edu.cn sfl@tongji.edu.cn zhiyong_mao@tongji.edu.cn.
Fang-Lin SunResearch Center for Translational Medicine at East Hospital, Advanced Institute of Translational Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; ying_jiang@tongji.edu.cn sfl@tongji.edu.cn zhiyong_mao@tongji.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-4729-1610
Zhiyong MaoClinical and Translational Research Center of Shanghai First Maternity & Infant Hospital, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, Frontier Science Center for Stem Cell Research, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; ying_jiang@tongji.edu.cn sfl@tongji.edu.cn zhiyong_mao@tongji.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-5298-1918
Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital · CNTongji University · CNCentral South University · CNSecond Military Medical University · CNZhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding differences in DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair between tumor and normal tissues would provide a rationale for developing DNA repair-targeted cancer therapy. Here, using knock-in mouse models for measuring the efficiency of two DSB repair pathways, homologous recombination (HR) and nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ), we demonstrated that both pathways are up-regulated in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) compared with adjacent normal tissues due to altered expression of DNA repair factors, including PARP1 and DNA-PKcs. Surprisingly, inhibiting PARP1 with olaparib abrogated HR repair in HCC. Mechanistically, inhibiting PARP1 suppressed the clearance of nucleosomes at DNA damage sites by blocking the recruitment of ALC1 to DSB sites, thereby inhibiting RPA2 and RAD51 recruitment. Importantly, combining olaparib with NU7441, a DNA-PKcs inhibitor that blocks NHEJ in HCC, synergistically suppressed HCC growth in both mice and HCC patient-derived-xenograft models. Our results suggest the combined inhibition of both HR and NHEJ as a potential therapy for HCC.

Indexed as

AnimalsCarcinoma, HepatocellularChromonesDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA DamageDNA End-Joining RepairDNA RepairDrug Therapy, CombinationGene Knock-In TechniquesHomologous RecombinationHumansLiver NeoplasmsMiceMice, NudeMorpholines8-dibenzothiophen-4-yl-2-morpholin-4-yl-chromen-4-oneChromonesDNA-Binding ProteinsMorpholinesolaparibPhthalazinesPiperazinesPoly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1clinical analysisDNA double-strand break repairknock-in mouse modelsNU7441olaparib

Identifiers

PMID33020270
PMCPMC7584895
OpenAlexW3090809699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.