ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2020
Pharmacokinetic Model for Cefuroxime Dosing during Cardiac Surgery under Cardiopulmonary Bypass.
Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Loading Dose of Ceftazidime Needs to Be Increased in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Study to Evaluate Recommended Loading Dose with Pharmacokinetic Modelling.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Heparin Dosing Regimen Optimization in Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Pharmacokinetic Analysis.Pharmaceutics · 2024Article
- Population pharmacokinetic model of cefazolin in total hip arthroplasty.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cefuroxime (CXM) is an antibiotic recommended for surgical site infection prevention in cardiac surgery. However, the dosing regimens commonly used do not sustain therapeutic concentrations throughout surgery. The aim of this study was to conduct a population analysis of CXM pharmacokinetics (PK), and to propose an optimized dosing regimen. Adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) received a 1,500 mg CXM intravenous bolus followed by a 750 mg bolus at CPB priming, then every 2 h thereafter. Model-based PK simulations were used to develop an optimized dosing regimen and evaluate its efficacy in attaining various concentration thresholds, including those recommended in US and European guidelines. In total, 447 CXM measurements were acquired in 50 patients. A two-compartment model best fit the data, with total body weight and creatinine clearance determining interpatient variability in the central and peripheral volumes of distribution, and in elimination clearance, respectively. Using our optimized dosing regimen, different dosing schemes adapted to body weight and renal function were calculated to attain total concentration thresholds ranging from 12 to 96 mg/liter. Our simulations showed that the dosing regimens recommended in US and European guidelines failed to maintain concentrations above 48 mg/liter. Our individualized dosing strategy was capable of ensuring therapeutic CXM concentrations conforming to each target threshold. Our model yielded an optimized CXM dosing regimen adapted to body weight and renal function, and sustaining therapeutic concentrations consistent with each desired threshold. The optimal target concentration and necessary duration of its maintenance in cardiac surgery still remain unclear.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.